The answers soon converge to some boring, bland repetition that isn't even logical.
No intelligence here, which means that code emitting LLMs are just stealing human IP that they happened to have read.
Same for a scientific discussion.
By the way, Bing Copilot absolutely aborts conversations it does not like. LLMs could also change the subject, like humans do if they detect repetition.
That's a completely different scenario than OP stated. In a political discussion you have an agenda, reasons to engage, plan for progress, constraints on topics/time, context and experience, and you know when to withdraw.
The scenario described is closer to "Do a political discussion." and being forced to continue forever.
Aside from that, if a human creates a new work that builds on other people's work, it must have sufficient creativity and magnitude to qualify as new IP.
A human also does not connect to the Internet and distributes the IP that they have read to millions of users for subscription fee.
Patreon, substack, reaction videos, the news?
"It's one of those irregular verbs, isn't it? I am inspired, you plagiarise, they are being prosecuted under Section 7 of the Copyright Act" - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36830574
Well, "stealing" is incorrect as they don't consume the original text - it's still there. "Plagiarising " would be more accurate.