You didn’t give examples, you called it “fanciful thinking” to think that there are real differences between people using vague claims about a different issue. The same logic for calling my categorization of that as a personal attack would apply evenly to your comment.

If you are concerned about politics being “infantile and tedious”, try to set an example of the rigor you’re looking for. For example, you could point to specific verifiable actions by a candidate like I did.