Hacker News Reader

Comment by colechristensen | Hacker News Reader

For the first 5 years videos were limited to 10 minutes. Clips of things were popular and there were things split between many videos, but that's not what I remember the people around me using youtube for.

View on HN

In my social groups at the time(late highschool, early college) it was exclusively used for watching TV shows. The 10min limit was only a minor annoyance, and more than made up for the fact that it was free fast video hosting at time when that was extremely rare.

It was not just a nerd thing either, I remember someone I was dating in the mid 2000s bemoaning that YouTube had cracked down on TV content.

As a former megavideo user… i watched many American tv shows I wouldn’t have watched otherwise. And i wouldn’t have paid anyway because at the time as a teenager i had no money of my own to spend.

Nowadays even when paying for content, it really feels like extortion, it’s unfair anyway (prices constantly increasing, and you still get ads even if you’re paying… might as well go back to pirating stuff)

you're moving the goalposts from "I didn't have money" to "I have money but it's not worth it".

Yes, because i did not have money when i was a teenager and have money now that i’m in my 30ies.

Also 10 minutes is right about where the commercial breaks would be anyway.

It was filled with music uploads.

It still is.

They have license and royalty agreements with labels now and takedown methods for rights holders who object to things as well as quite capable detection machinery.

I work in this space and there is still a ton of illegal content on YT. As stated earlier, the main difference is that YT complies when infringements are eventually found.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com