As a kid twenty years ago, I was mildly bothered by it but imagined they must know what they are doing.
Looking back at near 40, with the hindsight of years, I'm flummoxed. Like, what the hell, who's absolutely terrible idea was this?
As a kid twenty years ago, I was mildly bothered by it but imagined they must know what they are doing.
Looking back at near 40, with the hindsight of years, I'm flummoxed. Like, what the hell, who's absolutely terrible idea was this?
It's a serial number, not a shared secret. It sounds like your college treated it as such.
The real problem with SSN is the prevalence of unintended usage.
IMHO, as the name suggests, the intended usage is for social security. We're not supposed to have Citizen ID numbers which is why the number has been shoe-horned into this role.
There is nothing more permanent than a temporary solution, and nothing more temporary than a permanent solution.
> Private sector use of the SSN is neither specifically authorized nor restricted. People are asked for an SSN at banks, video rental outlets, hospitals, etc., and may refuse to give it. However, the provider may, in turn, decline to furnish the product or service, leaving some to conclude they have no real choice.
> Throughout the history of the Social Security program, the SSN, originally intended to be used only to record Social Security earnings, has been adopted for other purposes, both governmental and private. The broad-based coverage of the Social Security program makes the SSN widely available and a convenient common data element for all record-keeping systems and data exchanges.
Before the Internet SSN was "presumed secret" but it became a tragedy of the commons. By 2000 it was the equivalent of your public key and should have been treated as such by institutions, never used as password like that bookstore did.
Student ID card would have been the right way to verify identity at a college; I'd forgotten the SID defaulted to SSN, which was also really lazy decision!
But, to me, using SSN as a unique serial number feels correct. As somebody else mentioned, that's what it is - a serial number, not a shared secret. "Which John Smith are you?" is very similar to the VIN on a car answering "which Honda Civic?" SSN never proves that you are actually the John Smith you claim.
The bad idea was to try to convert a semi-public number into a secret identifier.
Back in the 80's, NYC had a program where the local police stations would lend you engravers so you could engrave your SSN on your TV, stereo, etc., so they could be returned if they were stolen and found. Probably also made pawn shops more reluctant to take them.
Guess it made sense at the time ;-)
the serial number was sequential based on last name, you could essentially guess anyones student id if you had a couple of data points of last name : serial number
As far as I know no one used it for nefarious purposes, but it was a cool party trick to guess someone’s number.