I felt like I was using Windows 8 "wrong" because I was throwing away the start screen after boot and not coming back to it.
I felt like I was using Windows 8 "wrong" because I was throwing away the start screen after boot and not coming back to it.
But then, you get home and decide you need to get some real work done so you plop that "tablet" back into the laptop and you have a full fledged laptop again. You can even hook it up into a multi monitor setup or whatever you want. Now get to work!
I think that will be really cool. One computer for both fun and work.
If that's what Microsoft is betting on, I'd be concerned for their overall strategy.
"Screens that support color? Hardly anyone has one of those."
I'm not saying that splitting the screen from the laptop is not cool, as I'm no Luddite! I'm merely remarking on the fact that Windows 8 seems to have been designed for the next generation of hardware, but there is no guarantees that this sort of hardware will be adopted by a large proportion of the market any time soon.
Just like someone above mentioned, Microsoft needs to jump first. Windows 8 is more extreme, but a similar example is that the release of Vista made 4GB of RAM become the defacto standard for laptops without raising price.
I'm sure this new hardware will be more expensive, but I would predict that less than a year after it's out, the prices will stabilize such that a split-screen laptop will cost the same as a normal one with the same specs would have a year or 2 ago.