Why are Apple laptops becoming harder to take apart?
rc3.org
rc3.org
I just spent two years transitioning my life away from windows, which I used for about 15 years, to OS X just to suddenly find that I can't run out and buy a new SSD hard drive to try on my system if I wanted to ... brilliant. The best part is, If reading HN threads where people are basically agreeing with this nonsense, because Apple made the decision.
Thats right, just keep taking away choices from the user until the entire company and its customers become one huge parody. oh, hang on ... we're already there. yuck.
It is clear that Apple went to great lengths to fit a 15" retina display to a powerful laptop while maintaining battery-life and trimming over a pound from the weight.
What, concretely, do you think they should have done differently?
That's a rhetorical question, no need to answer it, because any answer you give is going to be pure BS when compared to a product that I can actually drive across town and try (maybe even buy if I get there before their latest shipment sells out).
I'm 100% content with my 2nd generation Air. The new one has a faster chipset and disk, so what? It's not like I'm waiting long for stuff to happen on my laptop. I find this while outrage at Apple for making a laptop that's not upgradable a bit ridiculous. And yes, I used to upgrade laptops. No need anymore ;)
(The arguments about thinness make no sense. A torx screw is just as thin as a pentalobular screw. The unusual screw design is there solely as a "fuck you" gesture, which many people react quite positively to.)
How is this distinguishable from paring a device down to the elements necessary for its function? The ultimate in "form follows function" design would produce something fairly close to what you state.
Like it or not, dominance and submission is a powerful concept for humans, and Apple is exploiting this to get more of your laptop and tablet dollar.
Yeah, I always did have some sense that dominance of an aesthetic or cultural sort was somehow underlying everything they did. (And in some sense, it's always been a disturbing sense.)
For most people, replacement would be a better choice then upgrade.
i dont believe so - they are marketed to as being the better choice. However, a small upgrade (e.g., an extra stick of ram, a bigger SSD) is really all a consumer level user would need for a computer to last a bit more than 5 years. Obviously, this path sells less. But then you ahve to ask, why is it that you need to buy a new computer? its such a waste if the current one is only slightly slower, and a small upgrade will make it last another couple of years.
I'm ok with that, I'd prefer to get thinner hardware than hardware that I can upgrade, many of us have never upgraded a laptop anyways, and that's OK.
As for me, I've never upgraded a computer in my life beyond adding RAM, because in 4-years time, my motherboard inevitably becomes incompatible with everything in the market anyway. In order to upgrade, I'd have to buy a new motherboard.
So in that case, if I end up having to build/buy a new computer every four years anyway, is upgrading really that important? I don't upgrade my microwave. I don't upgrade my toaster.
My cars have become increasingly difficult to service myself over the years. When I bought my first car over twenty years ago I could do routine maintenance on it myself. Now when I open the hood of my Acura the whole engine compartment is covered and pieces must be removed to service it. This car is the most expensive computer I've ever bought and I'd wager it's even harder for the average user to service than the new MacBook Pro!
This mac book lockdown is akin to them locking out the tires of a car, so that the average person cant change it themselves, even tho theres no reason to do so other than as an anti-competitive measure.
Happy MBA convert after 15 years of Linux/pc.
That being said... I recently replaced the HDD in my girlfriend's Macbook and was pleasantly surprised as to how easy it was.
If it comes down to a tradoff between 20% larger size OR 100% inoperability if any single part goes down... I think I would choose the larger laptop.
The thing I'm annoyed with is the inability to swap out RAM sticks. The recent MacBook's usually allow for more RAM than Apple specifies. Theoretically, the MacBook Pro Retina model should handle 32 GB (16gb x 2). However, because the RAM is soldered, I won't be able to put that build together when those sticks are available in a few years. Which is kind of ridiculous when considering how much money ($3000+) is going into it.
Remember the story about tire companies buying trolley routes, running them out of schedule, people opting for other means of transportation because trolleys were never on time, than municipalits moving to buses because "nobody takes the trolleys anymore"?
It's the same.
Nobody upgrades their laptops because they are not made to be upgradable. Ram and hd? Hahaha. That's to easy seller prices not long term upgrade.
Heck, even the keyboard is already an addon on all models, yet there's no offer of key sizes or layouts.
CPUs could be socket instead of soldered, adding what? 1mm at most? Never been done.
My Toshiba Satellite in 1999 had a socketed AMD K6-II 380Mhz cpu, which I upgraded 10 years later as a "I wonder if...?" exercise before junking the computer.
Point: If you can squeeze a couple more years of service out of an upgradable laptop by maxing out the RAM, you should probably do so since the alternative is, basically throwing it away as landfill (note that the iFixit article said that claims about the body being recyclable were basically bunkum.)
So basically, every time you "never upgraded a laptop anyways, and that's OK", God kills an environmentally friendly kitten. Or something like that.
Sorry, but even this strikes me as dangerously close to FUD. A generic recycler couldn't be bothered to separate the screen glass from the lid, but I doubt there's any reason why Apple couldn't figure out a recycling strategy that would work. (And they basically provide the FedEx fee for you to send it back to them.)
"The design may well be comprised of “highly recyclable aluminum and glass” — but my friends in the electronics recycling industry tell me they have no way of recycling aluminum that has glass glued to it like Apple did with both this machine and the recent iPad."
I took this to mean that recycling was essentially impossible (by Apple or anyone else). Perhaps Apple can indeed figure out a recycling strategy. I doubt they will spend any time on it unless prompted by adverse publicity (like this article is generating).
I took this to mean that recycling was essentially impossible (by Apple or anyone else).
Well, as you basically admit below, the economics and motivations of most recyclers are not going to be the same as Apple. In any case, this doesn't mean that they won't take any aluminum that has ever had glass glued to it. It just means that they won't take something with the glass still glued to it.
I'll bet you $1000 that I could get the screen glass off of a Retina Macbook Pro with a hammer and an angle grinder or another common shop tool. (You supply the Macbook.) Most anything I can do inconveniently and dangerously at a hackerspace with an ordinary shop tool could be done with greater safety and lower unit cost with an appropriate custom tool.
Perhaps Apple can indeed figure out a recycling strategy. I doubt they will spend any time on it unless prompted by adverse publicity (like this article is generating).
So you don't know, and neither does your source. All you have is supposition, for which you leave yourself an out.