If we were getting opinions on the latest PhD paper on attention mechanisms than I’d trust someone with a PhD versus a random person, but for getting opinions on the new Google phone? Think for yourself.
Two things:
1. He's held / seen the phone live, I buy online so won't get a chance to before I decide.
2. He's also held hundreds (thousands?) of phones which I haven't.
While he does have preferences that differ from mine, his perspective is still interesting.
>what qualifies them?
19.3m subscribers on yt
Valuing someone by reach makes no sense at all. Most professors at MIT have no social media reach at all, I still value their opinions extremely highly.
In fact, valuing someone's opinion purely based on the size of their megaphone is partly why we're the world is in such a bad state politically (and in other ways) these days. E.g. people listening to social media influencers opinions on vaccines.