I Quit Spotify
newyorker.com
newyorker.com
They kept changing stuff, breaking my work flow, with every change it felt like there was more friction to listen to the music and podcasts I wanted, and less friction to listen to algorithmically selected slop I didn't want to listen to. Eventually I just said fuck it. I don't need this source of stress and frustration in my life. I've never looked back.
I'm on youtube music now. In many ways it's a worse product, but it at least stays the same and doesn't keep trying to make me change my listening behavior.
I suspect Spotify's problem is that they have (or had) too many developers, so you get this pressure to look busy "improving" the product, with endless lateral change as a result instead.
But, the industry does also have a "Developers Gotta Develop" problem. The way I've seen it explained is: "Programmers are like beavers. Leave a beaver alone to decide what to do and they'll just keep building dams, regardless of the fact that their home is done." I don't know if that's really true about beavers, but it's true about software organizations. The whole software development team will just continue changing the software even long past the point where they're done.
I swear I am not trying to be clever and throwing you a gotcha. I just never had any issues, and it may be down to how I use the service. Genuinely curious to how other people use it.
In my case, I only ever use Spotify on Android (or android auto if I am driving). I mostly listen to playlists I crafted myself. Sometimes I listen to one podcast or another when working out, but that's rare (I mostly listen to music).
What I am trying to say is that I barely interact with the UI at all - as it should be, I just want to listen to stuff. What is so bad about it?
- when they use to break local files playback (where you have your own mp3) every few months
- when "add to queue" function started lagging
- when "add to queue" stopped working for a day or two hntil it was fixed
- there was a week when I couldn't listen downloaded playlists in airplane mode. For some reason.
- constant changes in desktop app context menu by moving items "add to playlist" and "add to queue" around
- "smart shuffle" I don't use it but now I need to click shuffle twice. And it's lagging
- ios app is progressively getting slower and slower
- I use it for music so I don't need audiobooks and podcasts. I can't hide them and they take so much space
I moved to Apple Music in 2018 and regret nothing.
spotify has to try and distinguish or expand as seen with the heavy podcast investments and they desperately need hit features if they want to compete with the companies and stay profitable. for reference i believe this year will be the first profitable one
These days there are 10s of 1000s of radio stations with a web presence. From all over the world. Some have live DJs, some use automation, some have special syndicated programs. Over the years I've tried out many hundreds of them for an hour or two. Some are great! Many have multiple programs each day at regular times. It's a whole 'nother world. Some are college stations, some are long-time businesses like SOMA-FM.
I use VLC to listen to them (go to the 'Media' heading, select 'Open Media stream' and paste the URL ... instant play) , and to make a playlist to group stuff by genre or source-type.
Audio-quality-wise, if that's a concern, their bit-rates can vary from 50k to 320k. VLC can tell you that. Not a problem; if I don't like what I'm hearing today, I have lots of lossless favorites from my collection on a drive.
SOMA-FM has a great selection of genres you can try for starters. Or take a walk on the wild side by searching here [0], a site where all station info has been entered by users... including many that might be in your own neighborhood. Copy the URL and plug it into VLC.
Unlike Spotify, expert DJs select a wide range of music from genres that span the globe. Throughout the day, FIP curates an eclectic mix of genres—from jazz to rock, world music to classical—ensuring that I'm constantly exposed to various musical worlds without needing to curate or chase playlists myself.
FIP's programming is uninterrupted by DJs or ads, allowing for a seamless, immersive listening experience. The station's French commentary, when it occurs, adds a touch of charm without becoming a distraction, making it easy to "set it and forget it."
Do yourself a favour...
- "...We have removed all France Radio stations from TuneIn as per broadcaster request. We're sorry for the inconvenience and thank you for your understanding..."
:
https://old.reddit.com/r/tunein/comments/1buoei7/fip_radio_r...
Streams: https://gist.github.com/harperreed/b5ceabbbbca0a79d478ec0b81...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radio_Paradise
Edit: Love these wide curated music. I think what makes me love FIP and RP is it puts you into a good/mellow/calm mood.
I found out the hard way that Spotify features tons of videos and that you cannot disable them. See for instance
https://open.spotify.com/episode/5KS759AlVGVj34OHPbcx1p
There's also ton of dubious stuff in the "ASMR" category you probably wouldn't want your kid have access to and that is not caught by the "Explicit" filter, see for instance (NSFW!)
https://open.spotify.com/artist/3AxgfSNuDgYnz54lT4jkmT
Needless to say, I immediately canceled the Spotify family account.
Not only do they have a bunch of adult content hidden in there, but they also have tons of "video podcasts" available via search that are compilations of TikTok and streamer trash (like the one you linked). So if you are trying to keep young kids away from TikTok, trash-level Minecraft streamers, etc, but assume Spotify is safe because it is just music, your kids will find it and start getting hooked on TikTok via Spotify. It's really terrible and insidious. It feels like the tech industry is conspiring to get small children hooked.
There is a thread several years old on Spotify support where people have been complaining about this and they have done nothing. They are prioritizing engagement via crappy podcasts over delivering a music product that works for a range of customers (families, etc).
BTW, Apple Music has been totally fine as a replacement. I actually like it more. And there is a web app that will move all your old playlists over in minutes, so there's very little hassle in switching.
Yes, see for instance
https://community.spotify.com/t5/Live-Ideas/Add-quot-remove-...
https://community.spotify.com/t5/Premium-Family/How-can-I-fi...
I also remember that 2-3 years ago it was very easy to find hardcore porn images on Spotify, but at least they have fixed that, as this could have gotten them into real trouble. But otherwise, I think it's clear that Spotify has zero interest in disabling videos.
It's the same with Youtube, I actually had to resort to a third-party application (Freetube) to set up a curated list of channels for my kid he's allowed to watch, because it's not possible to do that in Youtube itself...
> It feels like the tech industry is conspiring to get small children hooked.
I think there's ample evidence that this is indeed the case.
Many of the complaints in the OP apply to Sonos too though, we brought into it years ago, and are incredible disappointed with the recent changes.
> Whole family uses Apple products
I cannot prove it but I feel a contradiction
The cost decision is "given we have purchased x, which service costs more?"
I think that's a pretty nice TCO right there.
That's brave. I've never owned an iPad, are they are they a lot more resilient to being dropped than I think? My 2yo drops what they're playing with about 4 times per minute. I've settled for a yoto player which I don't let them pick up!
Meanwhile I see kids at similar ages going around with phones that have screens that are just a complete mush of broken glass. Dunno why.
> artists and labels can identify music that’s a priority for them... it won’t require any upfront budget. Instead, labels or rights holders agree to be paid a promotional recording royalty rate for streams in personalized listening sessions where we provided this service
"Payola" is the term for radio stations secretly charging labels to feature their songs: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Payola
"Discovery Mode" is the modern structure. Instead of a station's single broadcast, it's many algorithmic playlists. Instead of the publisher paying up front because the radio and retailer are separate businesses, they just accept a lower royalty rate on plays because Spotify plays are the discovery and the sale together. Perhaps these differences and this press release is enough "disclosure" to avoid prosecution, I'm not a lawyer. I wish Spotify's internal legal analysis was public.
But all these gripes come back to: Spotify makes more money from this than when playing albums, curation, personal playlists, etc etc. There isn't a general issue of control or caring, there's a specific, nameable moneymaking "feature".
It got to the point where I couldn't figure out why on earth anyone would listen to radio when you can get all the music you like, with no ads, no news, and no Dave Doubledecks, for a few pounds a month. After a couple of weeks of using it, it started recommending music I'd never heard before, and really cool Scottish and Welsh folk music that the radio stations here would never touch, so I've discovered really cool stuff through it. I love that I can tell it never to show me certain artists - for instance, if I never heard Eminem again in my life it'd be too soon, so I've told it to never recommend any tracks by him, whereas local radio plays him incessantly.
For bonus fun count how many times it tries to interrupt you and have you listen to something cheaper, their in house podcasts or whatever the latest rap album they’re pushing is, despite that after tens of thousands of hours of listening they know you’ve never once chosen it or any adjacent genre.
Shameless promotion: rad is an auto D.J. that actually does follow your preferences https://rad.fm/
Site tried to detect my location. That's creepy and invasive. Tab closed instantly.
Thanks for the feedback though, I'll delay the location request to later in the flow + add a popover which explains why it's needed when we get to beta.
I want the ability to shuffle my library/play the latest releases/whatever while leaving albums intact.
I want to play the entirety of one album in order, then play another album in order, and so on.
Anyone know of an app that does this? I'll drop spotify today if some other streaming service can do this.
But now I imagine most people don't mind looking at the app every 30-90 minutes to choose a new album.
Also just looking at my saved albums in Spotify there's loads of crap in there just because I've downloaded it offline once in the past 10 odd years. A shuffle of these albums would suck.
So they'd probably have to fix the saving/favouring of albums before allowing shuffling of them.
https://apps.apple.com/us/app/albums-album-focused-player/id...
Spotify used to be cool and within the industry, the big example of engineering culture, agile with "the Spotify model" with squads and tribes etc. being able to adapt and ship stuff quickly.
But now somehow it seems they regressed into an organization that cannot ship basic features (stuff like lossless audio) for years, and that is more interested in pursuing legal action than in pursuing customers. Reading a book about why would be a good lesson for many people in IT.
What I generally see is they are reactive largely to the whims of leadership, they don’t understand their users, they don’t do any research or testing, they don’t aim for ambitious new ideas (more often aping what other companies do), so we’ve ended up in this milieu of product experiences that feel weirdly homogenous and ultimately very unfitting with what the product should be.
I’m just a guy but I hope someone with a louder, more important megaphone writes up something soon on this because the industry needs to shine a spotlight on these folks.
Recently, I finally switched to Apple Music after discovering there is absolutely no way to disable video podcasts on child accounts and that because of that, Spotify search is full of TikTok compilations, Minecraft streamers, and straight up adult content that you absolutely can't disable for children. It's really terrible and unforgivable.
The good news is (1) I actually like Apple Music a lot more, even on Android and (2) switching took like 5 minutes using Soundiiz. It is a web app where you log into both services and it syncs your playlists and collections instantly. I have no connection to it and there are probably other similar services that might be just as good, but it worked really well for me and was worth the $5 or whatever I payed. I moved everyone in my family over to Apple Music and no one complained or lost any playlists.
Since being on Apple Music, it's really refreshing that they prioritize music features over dumb engagement features. They promote lossless audio and spatial audio remixes instead of trying to push paid podcasts and other junk you don't want. It also supports streaming your own local music that is not in their library. It is a really nice product.
Obviously both are giant companies who don't care about you, but Apple Music really seems like a better product to me made by people who actually listen to music.
Mine start to rot in less than a year. On all my playlists large percentage of the songs just disappear after a while. Whether that's because songs were removed from Spotify due to licensing agreements expiring, the artist deleting them for some other reason I don't know, but the end result is a really frustrating user experience.
Using the non-shuffling feature titled 'smart shuffle' is the most frustrated I have been using any software in my 30 years of life. If your connection speed is not on big US city level, accidentally toggling shuffle practically halts the application for minutes. Reference: https://community.spotify.com/t5/Live-Ideas/Mobile-Other-Sma...
For credibility: there are 142,664 scrobbles saved on my last fm since 2013. I use the service a lot and wish I did not have to resort to modding tools like Spicetify for basic feature toggles. Way to ruin a wonderful product. If there was a 'Spotify but only the music you choose', I'd switch in an instant.
I think the only thing that really bothers me is that you might add a song or an album to your library but for some reason that doesn’t automatically add the artist to your library. I feel like they should all be interlinked.
I don’t use the desktop app at all though. Maybe the mobile app just has a better design?
not to mention the recommendations is also on another level so their curated maxtapes. although i assume that last one has a lot to do with your genre preference but rap/hip hop wise i think its true.
the new song discoverability is the only reason i prefer Spotify even though i get prime and apple free from other bundles already.
i do like the library and playlist separation tho. youtube and i think apple are like this where if you delete off playlist it deletes off your library as well. its really annoying haha
- Spotify pays fractions of pennies per play to the artist ($0.00318)
- Apple Music pays about three times more ($0.008)
- Tidal pays more than Apple Music ($0.01284)
I picked Apple because I've got it anyway through Apple One, if I wasn't in The Ecosystem, I'd switch to Tidal since it integrates with PlexAmp directly.https://virpp.com/hello/music-streaming-payouts-comparison-a...
I pay less per month for music for the whole family AND the artist make more for each play.
Does anyone here have experience with Tidal? I have heard good things about them.
The biggest issue I have library-wise is with bad release year metadata often being incorrect for rereleases and remasters, and deluxe versions being the default. Irritating but small quarrels in the big scheme of things.
I never understood people's fetishization of albums and "enjoying" an album and all the music app interfaces created around that. I just want a cloud or self hosted version of winamp, where jumping to the next song or queueing it up from my playlist is a hotkey away rather than 12 clicks on a crowded interface.
Been moving to navidrome but i expect to eventually need some workarounds to get what i want.
Edit: also the poor implementation that is smart shuffle and shoving it down my throat
Think about it as an opera. Of course, Nessum Dorma sounds great by itself, but wouldn't it hit different if you hear it in the context of the whole story, with emotional buildup and everything?
There are concept/themed albums where the songs tell a story and you are supposed to listen them from start to finish.
Also several times an album is actually how the artists themselves wanted to release/listen/publish their songs (instead of individual tracks with no relation among them)
Some albums are written to be enjoyed as a whole. A song might set up the next. Listening to an artist album by album gives you an idea of their progression. This might not be for everyone but surely isn't alien.
I know, I know, this sounds way too pretentious and elitist...
Basically, some music is made to be digested in small, radio/club-sized pieces and I argue that most of it does so not to fulfill an artistic vision. There are some exceptions, using this opportunity to maximize "streamlining" (I mean, I listen to some Eurobeat, so I fully understand that) and St Exupery's famous "Perfection is achieved, not when there is nothing more to add, but when there is nothing left to take away", but that's definitely not the rule.
Also, people already drew pretty good comparisons to opera and other stuff that loses too much by being listened on a single track basis.
Addendum: elitism may have a very double-plus-ungood connotation in the current year, but I've never heard a valid, factual argument against it; which is even funnier when you realize the kind of people conditioned to react this way to the word have a similar filter for "populism".
It's basically one of the modern "witches" arguments.
I've always found strange that judging musical taste (or lack of it) is so controversial compared to other forms of art. If you say that people who only watch MCU movies or haven't read more than Harry Potter/Twilight are "plebeians" (or whatever less offensive word you want to use... philistine?), you'll get way less outrage than by stating something similar about music.
In the end, I think the disagreement may stem from two points: "plebeian" is automatically seen as an insult, not a possibly accurate (if condescending) descriptor and the usual extreme relativism that caring about music is should as universal as caring about tractors.
For sure there are albums that are like that, i just don't tend to listen to music like that. I listen to a song, i think "oh, i want to listen to that next", queue it up and forget i wanted to listen to it until it comes up and i feel good about hearing that song i wanted.
And definitely far from the greatest hits only - that's a pretty stretchy conclusion.
edit: the problem i have at the end of the day, is forcing EVERYONE to organize their music and listening like that because the artist says "this is how you must listen to music". Sometimes i know the song i like and i just want to pick them out instead of browsing through another layer of albums that hide the list of songs by an artist.
I mean, I won't force people not to put ketchup in all their dishes, including when going to a 1-star Michelin restaurant, but if that's not the dictionary definition of "pleb", I don't know what is.
I don't necessarily listen to ALL of it at once, I will mostly be queueing up what i want to listen to next constantly and skip through what i don't feel like listening to right now (if the platform allows it easily, which i'm struggling to find again). On another day in another mood, that same song i skipped previously might be just what i need.
Almost as if i can choose my meal and my dessert independently every day depending on what i feel like eating.
edit: and occasionally, it may be a $500 aubergine steak - when i want it to be.
About meal and dessert, I've never experienced a strong and justified coupling between these; actually, I always rinse my mouth with water between dishes to fully embrace the taste divide.
BTW, there is winamp-js, which is Winamp in your browser. I think the Winamp clone AIMP has a web-interface, but I could be wrong.
The issue is almost every good music application assumes an organization style by artist/album, which in the modern world, may not be how things still work. To me, albums are a suggestion/release unit.
shitification thats spotify.
I would like to see a HN inspired web site that lists all of the bands and musicians where we can click on a link and go directly to the band or musicians web site and buy or download the music directly from them.
No middle man earning a small fortune off the backs of those talented musicians.
I would love to see a Bandcamp streaming service which fairly compensates artists and has a more discovery focussed UI, but they don’t seem that interested in evolving the product for whatever reason (they have had a fairly rough sounding series of acquisitions)
There's also the Discover tool at the bottom of their homepage which includes 'artist-recommended', a new and notable section, and they have regular blog posts for various genres.
You could also try https://bc-explorer.app/
Nowadays my Discover Weekly is nothing but "lo-fi" elevator music, despite my best efforts to dissuade it with the dislike button. Worse, if you click in to any of the artists of these songs they're all mysteriously vacant profiles with no social media connections or descriptions.
I absolutely despise Spotify as a company and have felt trapped by them for years so maybe I have an unreasonable bias against them in thinking this, but the thought crossed my mind that they're creating this slop themselves to suck up as many streaming minutes as possible to avoid paying real artists/producers.
Of course, it's also possible they're just turning a blind eye to abusers who generate this stuff and flood the platform looking for a quick buck. Mutually beneficial for them I guess.
Summary (thanks, Kagi!):
> a recent app update altered its interface, making it harder to navigate
Spotify constantly change their interface ever so slightly.
I personally often like the changes. I sometimes can't find things.
This is a really valid point of criticism, but not something everyone agrees is a bad thing.
> app shifts towards promoting playlists and algorithmically generated content over traditional albums
OK, this is the real reason.
I like the algorithmic recommendations.
It helps me discover electronic music which has a high similarity.
When algorithmic recommendations are not sufficient, and I have actual time on my hand to explore music, I browse the "Artists like this one..." directory, old-school style.
I mostly play "Liked songs" and explore recommendations on adventurous days.
> corporate profit over user experience
Isn't really an argument.
> feel increasingly alienated from their music, with algorithms dictating listening habits
If argument does not sound convincing, repeat the argument.
> diminishes the significance of entire albums
To be more precise, Spotify is changing the reward mechanism to favor singles over albums:
https://www.grizzlybeatz.com/lofi-hip-hop-blog/why-releasing...
I'm not convinced it's just a bad thing.
The landscape is changing.
People still make albums if they feel like it.
We missed an email about address verification, despite we living in the same place for many years and being a paid user for 15 years, and now my wife can’t rejoin the plan for a year.
Moving to Tidal, and perhaps starting buying CDs again.