Hacker News Reader

yes, according to Google, that's the split. But you are relying on Google to correctly report the revenue and correctly report which videos it should be attributed to. How sure are we that Google is being honest with how they are handling things? They have been proven to be quite the liars in the past.

View on HN

THIS. I know many creators who have quit because they are simply not getting the ROI for the level of effort they put in before. Call it what you want, or put the blame on them, but at a certain point a vast majority of people saying "we aren't making any money anymore" can't all be wrong.

I wouldn't trust Google or Sundar in the slightest to the what is the best interest of users. They can only be counted on doing what is best for them first, shareholders second. Users are seen as a gadfly that must be managed, like employees.

No, that is according to the contract that creators agree to. This is widely reported by creators.

Yes, I realize that is the contract. But are they allowing their view counts to be audited by an unbiased 3rd party? I wouldn't be surprised if they are using "Hollywood accounting" to calculate those revenue shares.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com