Snopes was nowhere near as positive as you are about the Detroit Metro picture:
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/harris-walz-crowd/
> Isitai.com, another detection tool, described the image as "somewhat likely human generated," estimating a 58% chance that it's not AI.
can't reply so I'm editing this instead:
I didn't say that 18 inch neck was in the Metro photo. Read it again.
As for "cherry-picking": so did you.
"reasonable doubt" is a perfectly legit thing to raise. If it were a jury, that would be enough for an acquittal.
I don't see it. Do you? Point to it.
Was it another image you are referring to? Well then that wasn't the image that Trump blasted as made by AI so that's irrelevant. Trump was specifically calling the Detroit metro picture as you call it AI generated and the crowd "fake". Did you watch the video of the rally and agree that the crowd was fake? Really?
Furthermore, you cherry picked the results on the picture he referred to. The other: "Nevertheless, we scanned the image through two online AI-detection tools. The first, Winston AI Image Detector, determined the image was "96% human" "