> The last sentence suggests that they were actively trying to get back to their assigned altitude of 17,000′.
I believe the author is implying that if the pilots attempted to maintain speed rather than altitude, the aerodynamic stall wouldn't have occurred - if they descended below 12000', the icing would be reversible.
"So… icing by itself likely cannot be the cause of the recent accident in Brazil."
Mentour Pilot four years ago on superstall (deep stall): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kg6jV5mkf-8&t=0s
T-tail aircraft (like this one!) are at risk. ATR-72 specifically mentioned.
>"Right, it was that bolded "400'" climb that clearly is what hes pointing at - as the ice caused the drop, then the pilot sharply climbed, then ice-stall, causes plane to yaw pilot corrects the wrong direction causing spin - all in the course of what seems like ~30 seconds?"
Is what my thoughts are.