Urchin Software Corp: The unlikely origin story of Google Analytics (2016)
urchin.biz
urchin.biz
Of course, “utm” lives on today as a standard prefix for link tracking parameters, even outside of google analytics
I wasn't able to process the daily logs of the tracking pixel of the site I was operating on Urchin 5 within 24 hours. I had a beefy server with a 16 drive raid array but the log processing never used multiple cores.
By that time Google had aquired them, support didn't exist because they wanted you to switch to Google Analytics and it was basically 30k down the drain.
VC backed passing out was way different and not in the somewhat elitist sense that prevails in Europe.
Play hard, party hard mixed with friendly and open nerd frat house mentality in California is one of a kind compared to then cold and dark winters in Europe. People forget that there is essentially always sun, a huge difference.
Some had a 17:00 party break every weekday, loud music and food 17:00 sharp no exceptions, a phenomenon what became after work parties in Europe, but were more or less barbecue parties for casual idea sharing and bonding.
Catering costs for a month alone would have killed every startup or company in EU.
And then imagine special occasions somewhere else. These people knew how to have a good time - to pass out one way or the other.
Happy times.
It is incredible how out of touch with reality GA has become. Nothing is called what it used to be, and not a single straight report with simple familiar figures. Everything is abstracted to the point of it being useless. I am pretty sure I understand what happens with the GA team today [1]
We run self-hosted Matomo for analytics. One of the bonus points, besides actual sane reports is that Matomo can see about ~40% more traffic due to being invisible to blockers while being fully GDPR compliant and providing full privacy for visitors.
[1] https://www.joelonsoftware.com/2001/04/21/dont-let-architect...
Would you be willing to elaborate?
Google already had a reputation for slurping up user data, even in 2008 before they bought DoubleClick. It's a no brainer that a targetted advertising company can target ads better if they have as much information about the users as possible.
In 2008, DoubleClick's over the top, obnoxious advertising (banner ads, punch the monkey, etc.) was slowing down in favor of Google's more discrete advertising and data collection. They may have caught on and turned it around eventually, but Google bought them up first.
Pardon my one nitpick: the computer in the photo (PowerMac1,1) was introduced 1999-01-05.
Our first computer at Cygnus was a sparcstation that was actually a “prototype” (probably PVT since it had all the housing etc) for the first sparcstation. I think Andy B had given it to John. It worked fine and lasted for years.
When the author said they’d started the company on a 10K investment I knew they were my kind of people.
See also "A Brief History of NetGravity":
In October 1999, DoubleClick purchased NetGravity in a stock deal valued at $530m. The NetGravity product line is now completely incorporated into the DoubleClick portfolio of advertising management products. The original founders and management team have all left to pursue new opportunities. NetGravity, having helped to create the multi-billion dollar internet advertising market, has essentially ceased to exist.
-- https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41206733
DoubleClick rebranded NetGravity AdServer as DART Enterprise... On March 11, 2008, Google acquired DoubleClick for $3.1 billion. In June 2018, Google announced plans to rebrand its ads platforms, and DoubleClick was merged into the new Google Marketing Platform brand.
Further because that leaves out the Overture / Inktomi part of Google’s revenue origin story…
> Tracking your analytics makes traffic grow. Refreshing your analytics makes traffic stall.
- never checking your analytics means you're probably going to stagnate forever,
- checking them at a fixed frequency means you're going to look at what's worked and work hard to keep it going, so traffic grows,
- checking them at every time of the hour (I was at my worst when I switched from Urchin to Xiti client-side analytics in '06) means you're switching back to a passive almost-superstitious wait for the number to move, which is both frustrating and extremely ineffective.
I've been there and done all 3, and as CEO of a startup[0] I find it's my job to do my best to stay in the middle :)
The origin story of Google Analytics - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12986649 - Nov 2016 (53 comments)
I DO know about Yellow Dog Linux as it was the Linux officially supported on a PS3 console!
This never came to anything.
They even had some of the biggest sites in Europe as customers.
However, the company never turned a profit and after going through the hands of a few investors, they closed shop.
With what we know about how/why/where the use of those analytics are used back then, would we make the same decisions if it was a choice today?
I remember being shocked at the idea of putting Google's JavaScript in our secure e-commerce site. We wanted to pay as little as possible for traffic and were mining the long tail of keywords. We certainly did not want AdWords to know what our economics were.
Ultimately AdWords evolved into a very efficient system that groups similar keywords and takes as much margin as the advertisers can handle. The golden days of a level playing field in ppc advertising were over and Google won the game :)
(In case anyone else is surprised by the line in the article that the “10th anniversary of the acquisition has recently passed.”)
Android was a company Google acquired.
I have a huge amount of respect for the Urchin team. They had to figure out everything for the first time on their own with nothing to go off of while going after a much smaller and earlier market.