The Rise of Neotoddlerism: how society encourages activists to act like infants
gurwinder.blog
gurwinder.blog
Pretty sure this is entirely ahistorical.
FWIW though, politicians have only really gotten appreciably stupider in the US. They’re not great here in Canada but they never have been. Even as far-right politics have gained renewed prominence in Europe (notoriously not new), they’re not being carried by MTG-esque bozos.
This suggests that an analysis that blames a global phenomenon like social media is flawed.
I don't have any numbers but pretty sure violent protests, attacking monuments and historic sites, or just doing extremely provocative stuff was the exception, not the norm? Of course there will be plenty of historical events, but I don't even remember the last pacific protest or sit-down I've seen recently. These days your local beekeepers association is resorting to these tactics, because it's the only thing that works in the social media era. Combine that with general restlessness in western societies, increased police violence, and here we are...
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suffragette_bombing_and_arso...
The author somehow skips the part where Civil Rights activists were criticized for the exact same reason in their time (i.e. disrupting the daily life of people).
There are many points to make about methods of protest, but this is just not a good analysis piece.
“…that the Negro’s great stumbling block in his stride toward freedom is not the White Citizen’s Councilor or the Ku Klux Klanner, but the white moderate, who is more devoted to ‘order’ than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice; who constantly says: ‘I agree with you in the goal you seek, but I cannot agree with your methods of direct action’; who paternalistically believes he can set the timetable for another man’s freedom; who lives by a mythical concept of time and who constantly advises the Negro to wait for a ‘more convenient season.’ ”
That does not make all civil disobedience well considered or justified. But it's important to recall that we delay and delay and delay justice, and then waggle our fingers when people realize that if justice were really to be given by talking politely it would have already happened.
I think the point is that many modern protests are pure disruption without any redeeming characteristics.
That cluster B personality disorders seem to be having more "effect" on society than they used to is something I've noticed myself and the reasons for why this is the case are unclear.
Well no, their nonsense premise is subtly different from this one in that they don't even aspire to misdiagnose the people engaging in nuisance protests.
Just last night I attended a public meeting regarding a major infrastructure project to improve Lake Shore Drive in Chicago. The project was billed as “redefine the drive”, but over a 10 year period of planning and studies, the near-final proposal was whittled down to a series of incremental improvements to some of the major pain points along LSD. Actually a lot of good stuff.
Transit and anti-car activists in the city were understandably upset as each proposal that actually prioritized transit (e.g. adding dedicated bus lanes) were eliminated the further the project went. Why? For a list of reasons far too long to dive into here, but chief among them there are major practical issues because of the history of that corridor and the sheer impact of upending one of the most traveled roads in a large city. They have to please the Illinois DOT, Chicago DOT, Chicago Parks, various other departments, meet specific requirements to qualify for federal funding (without this, the project dies), etc. Bottom line: as much as I want LSD transformed into a transit corridor, I understand why this may never happen, and almost certainly won’t happen in one fell swoop.
But a subset (not all) of the activists were just there to shit on everything. I was in one group conversation where a woman kept telling one of the planners how terrible this was and how mad she was, but when pressed for specifics she couldn’t articulate why. This kind of activism is a pure distraction. It closes the minds of people making decisions and makes it harder to have substantive debates about the issue.
To be clear, I have major issues with how the project has unfolded and shared those concerns with project leadership. It felt like a good conversation and they thanked me for having a perspective I could articulate. I don’t have much optimism that the conversation will change this project, but I now have rapport with some of the city/state leaders.
With very few exceptions, going in screaming undermines whatever it is you’re supporting. Dialogue is all we have available to change people’s minds, and true change comes from shifting collective consciousness, not by screaming the loudest. This is not to say there’s no place for anger. Anger is a signal/fuel that drives us to action. But operating from that place of anger by definition puts you at a disadvantage. Rational conversations do not happen when rage is involved.
How is this not already true? There are scores of Lake Shore Express buses every day on routes like the 134, 135, 136, 143, 146 and 147. The Lakefront Trail has a well-maintained, grade-separated bike path that runs the entire length, alongside a running path the same (and at place the bikes and runners are also grade-separated).
LSD is in need of many improvements, especially car-related ones, but to claim that it is not a transit corridor strikes me as disingenuous. It is more a "transit corridor" than perhaps anywhere else in the city
Yes, and during busy periods, it’s often impossible to get a bus because they’re stuck on the drive, and when you do get a bus, you sit with the rest of the congestion. Watching your incoming bus disappear from the bus tracker is a regular occurrence, and people regularly plan for 30-60 minute delays because it’s impossible to know if today is a 20 or a 60 minute trip. This is a significantly worse transit experience than areas of the city served by the L or even other inland bus routes.
Most of the early proposals for the project specifically focused on dedicated bus lanes with a goal to encourage more bus use by ensuring people can actually get buses and those buses can actually get from point A to B. The proposal they’re moving forward with makes incremental improvements but falls far short of the original goals and what many Chicagoans and their representatives have been pushing for.
> The Lakefront Trail has a well-maintained…
Yes, I ride it daily. There are numerous danger zones where accidents regularly occur due to mixed bike, pedestrian and vehicle traffic. In just the past two weeks, I’ve encountered three cars on the bike trail, and this happens regularly. Improving these zones is one of the major wins in the proposal. There are also major stretches that are just on the other side of a single guard rail, and riding those stretches involves breathing massive amounts of exhaust. Some of the improvements incrementally improve this, but there had been hopes that they’d reroute the trail in those area to improve safety. But there just isn’t enough space in many cases.
> but to claim that it is not a transit corridor strikes me as disingenuous
Maybe you misunderstood the comment? The project started with a goal of expanding public transit and improving safety for pedestrians and cyclists. Right now, LSD is a highway meant for cars that some buses run on. I live by the red line so I can get north/south easily. The same cannot be said for people living right on the lake.
This is a once in 100 years type of project, and was seen as an opportunity to revamp public transit along the lake. This is why they spent 10 years trying to figure out how to put bus lanes in, and it’s not because it’s currently a good option for buses. It’s also why people got really upset about the direction it’s going, and thus my original comment.
> It is more a "transit corridor" than perhaps anywhere else in the city
Do you live here and use public transit on LSD regularly? Because this is just demonstrably not true. Yes, there are some bus routes that use the drive. The effectiveness of those routes varies wildly, which is one of the driving reasons behind the project.
The movement was deeply divided about whether that did more good than harm. And there's really no way to know. But it's nonetheless true that women had been campaigning for decades, and got success not long after the violence started.
Violence is the worst tool in the protest toolbox. Especially since it is available to everyone, regardless of the merits of their cause, and in fact the worst causes are the first to use it. But it comes as no surprise that even the best causes eventually reach for that tool when every other one has failed.
We used to have a popular term called “nanny state” that fits well in this discussion.
Nanny state, infant subjects
I've seen this escalate in media for many years, where loud childish points are celebrated. One current example is how republicans are "weird", and repeated by everyone for the last week, and a talking point even in international media (I'm not from the US). That's the story I'm told about US elections, that democrats think republicans are weird.
And everything that catches our attention will be repeated since they see it working and this destructive cycle continues. The idiocracy is here.