Would be interested to hear a comparison with keycloak.
I don't care. Transaction volumes to the auth are comparatively low and computers are cheap so keycloak is a good choice.
I keep repeating this comparison throughout this thread, but Stack is to Keycloak/Ory/etc. what Clerk is to Auth0.
Though, I regularly recommend Keycloak in sales calls when I talk to larger companies willing to invest time and effort into a custom IdP. We are not really looking to replace those use cases.
On the other hand, Auth0 attempts to close of the complexity of the space by creating an opaque/proprietary layer. And then the primary pain point with Auth0 is that it's feature are behind another pricing tier.
If less complexity is what Stack Auth does differently than Keycloak. Does it do so by having a less transparent view of the auth process? Or does it do it by surfacing this complexity in a more digestible format?