from what ive read microsoft is partially liable for allowing crowdstrike to make updates the way they did, forcing updates and then not detecting and disabling the affected driver. maybe im wrong. seems like theyre finger pointing and that makes me think theyre guilty even more.
Windows did not disable the driver because Crowdstrike marked their driver as critical for boot. Had they not done that, Windows would disable the driver automatically.
didn't you hear? the EU forced them to let Crowdstrike to be able to do it...
This is the EU's fault :-P
They did supply Windows, and Microsoft is the one throwing shade.