There has been an incredible amount of work over the last decade put into all the things you mentioned, which it sounds like you're unfamiliar with. https://github.com/haskell/haskell-language-server in particular is a pleasure to use in my experience. Package management is far from perfect, but it's always being worked on and I'll take it over anything in Python or the Node.js ecosystems any day. Developer experience has improved a lot since I started using the language and this is an area that the community and leadership absolutely cares about--I'd be surprised if anyone spent time reading relevant discussions in https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals or https://discourse.haskell.org/ or etc. and agreed with you.
> Haskell has the worst support for records of all its peers. SML, OCaml, F# all have better records.
> Without good records it’s unreasonably hard to write large software projects.
> AFAIK it’s hard to retrofit ML-style structural subtyped records onto Haskell, because the type system is designed around that not being possible.
Haskell is not ML, and while Haskell records are weak they are not what is preventing people from writing big projects in Haskell. There is much more to the language than records. But I said this in my previous comment.
Nothing you've written resonates with me, and I've written Haskell and PureScript professionally as well as Java and JS along with a bunch of other languages that haven't been mentioned. I'm also actively working on an open source project in my spare time with thousands of lines of Haskell and PureScript code (https://github.com/ddellacosta/automation-service), not to mention a half dozen other random half-done projects and contributions I've made to other open source libraries and applications. What have you written in Haskell that has made you dislike it so much?
> Talk is cheap.
Yes it is.