What point are you trying to make?
You are correct that clock free designs exist. But calling it a mere consequence of sync design seems to be a misunderstanding of why sync design has a clock in the first place.
You are correct that clock free designs exist. But calling it a mere consequence of sync design seems to be a misunderstanding of why sync design has a clock in the first place.
In the case of QDI circuits, it was to point out that there exists CPUs which do not contain clocks, again challenging the assertion that the reason computers have clocks is "to make sure all transistors in a given stage of a CPU reach a steady state".