Does space dust fall on the roof of my house?
astronomy.stackexchange.com
astronomy.stackexchange.com
So? That doesn't mean they landed on the roof from space. The really tiny stuff can be blown around. It may land on the ground at point A and then be blown onto a roof miles away at point B. This is why we should not use the simple math of a roof's size to determine the rate of material falling from space.
Some of the earth is decayed earlier material - radon gas formed here on earth as a daughter product from uranium in granite.
Some of the earth has been created by man on earth in the atomic age ... all those extra elements tacked to the end of the periodic table.
Don't those decay immediately? They would account for 0% of the earth.
There are a lot of isotopes.
Granted, that's an isotope of a well-known element, not one of the "extra elements tacked to the end of the periodic table". I can point out that [tiny traces of plutonium-244 have been found in the ocean seafloor](https://www.npr.org/2021/05/13/996499035/freshly-made-pluton...). That has a half-life of about 80 million years; it's probably the result of ejecta from a supernova washing over the Earth several million years ago.
Dust is composed of things like pollen, dirt, tiny particles of sand, dried plant material, and so forth. There is plenty of outdoor dust that is natural.
I have an incredibly hard time seeing how an outdoor IKEA roof, with tons of shoppers in their cars and delivery trucks and whatnot, is going to be some kind of pristine collection area.
I think this is the same amateur astronomer I was reading about: https://www.cbc.ca/radio/quirks/september-30-2018-1.4312266/...
It’s the difference between finding a needle in a haystack and a needle on a kitchen table with 10 pieces of hay strewn on it.
https://www.sciencefriday.com/articles/up-on-the-roof-a-hand...
He was featured in Werner Herzogs 2020 film, Fireball: Visitors from Darker Worlds.
A much cooler way to put this is that if you spend 1 hour per day on average not under a roof, and if we ignore some complications, your expected micrometeorite-strikes-per-lifetime is about 0.5:
(1/24 of the time outside) * (1.5 per meter squared per year) * (80 years) * (pi * 8 inches * 6 inches) = 0.486 [1]
where the last term here is an approximate cross-sectional area of the human head as viewed from above. (Micrometeorites reach terminal velocity at a very high altitude, so they should be falling almost vertically as they strike the ground, minimizing your cross-sectional area unless you happen to be lying down.)Someone doing manual labor or other primarily-outdoor work has an expected-micrometeorites-per-lifetime much greater than 1, and therefore is overwhelmingly likely to have space dust in their hair at least once in their life. If you spend 8 hours outside per day (so your workday + some miscellaneous non-work time that covers days you're not working), your expected lifetime impacts is ~4, so your chance of >= 1 impact is 1 - Pois(0; 4) = 1 - e^-4 = about 98%.
A better calculation would account for the fact that Earth's orbital motion makes the relative motion of impacts non-uniform in the same way the front of a moving car is hit by more raindrops than the rear. This means most strikes occur around dawn, because that's the time when you're on the "front" of the Earth as it moves in its orbit.
Early-morning workers, like agricultural, sanitation, or custodial workers, might be out for the peak of impacts nearly every day, while the average reader here who drifts into the office hours after dawn (if at all) and spends most of their outdoor time in the evening might almost entirely miss their opportunity to have a bit of space fall on their head. (I think this is rather poetic: if you want to touch the stars, go pick up trash!)
-----
[1] https://www.wolframalpha.com/input?i=%281+hour%2F24+hour%29+...
[0]https://archive.org/details/insearchofstardu0000lars/mode/1u...
A prime meteorite and meteoric-dust hunting ground is Antarctica. With an ice cap that's kilometres thick, odds are high that all rocks, and much dust, found on the surface of the snow are meteoric in origin.
2018 story on that: "Hot on the trail of Antarctic meteorites" <https://www.snexplores.org/article/hot-trail-antarctic-meteo...>
And yes, there's a global warming angle on this as well: "Thousands of hidden meteorites could be lost forever as they sink in Antarctic ice, taking their cosmic secrets with them" <https://www.livescience.com/space/meteoroids/thousands-of-hi...> (2024)
Of course you'd want it to be something like a light year thick. That may be impractical. Plus there are minor structural problems, such as how to stop it from spontaneously collapsing into a black hole.
Wouldn't that be far more dependent on particle size? Micrometeorites are going to reach terminal velocity fairly quickly, and that's largely going to be based on particle size and density, rather than original velocity.
Sand-grain-sized micrometeorites (or the sand-grain-sized surviving fragments of larger meteors) will have a terminal velocity of on the order of a metre per second or so.
There are a heap of better links to micrometeorites stories than this stackexchange. Discussed many times on HN.