Jailbroke my Kindle to use it as an e-ink monitor
gist.github.com
gist.github.com
Edit: https://gist.github.com/adtac/eb639d3c707b55a28f0ee9a420aa7e...
https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1820127349548982272/vi...
You could probably direct link it in markdown to embed it, although i'm not sure if Twitter will serve it on a high-traffic gist like this one after a while (I imagine there's some sort of rate limit-based hotlink protection).
Though it did already point to the gist back then, and I am still unsure how I can tell it pointed to twitter originally.
Thanks though?
You can usually find a comment by dang saying something like "we've changed the URL from <old link>".
news.ycombinator.com##tr.athing:has(a[href^="from?site=twitter.com"])
news.ycombinator.com##tr.athing:has(a[href^="from?site=twitter.com"])+tr
news.ycombinator.com##tr.athing:has(a[href^="from?site=x.com"])
news.ycombinator.com##tr.athing:has(a[href^="from?site=x.com"])+tr
news.ycombinator.com##tr.athing:has(a[href^="from?site=medium.com"])
news.ycombinator.com##tr.athing:has(a[href^="from?site=medium.com"])+tr
2 rules each because the replies and the story titles don't share a common parent element. eg right now I can tell from the numbers beside the stories that number 23 is missing; but otherwise HN looks the same. The same trick works for google search results; I have rules like the ones below to block less useful tutorial sites when I'm looking for python/js docs: google.com##div:has(>div>div>span>a[href^="https://www.w3schools"])
google.com##div:has(>div>div>span>a[href^="https://www.geeksforgeeks"])
google.com##div:has(>div>div>span>a[href^="https://realpython.com"])
google.com##div:has(>div>div>span>a[href^="https://www.programiz"])
google.com##div:has(>div>div>span>a[href^="https://www.datacamp"])
Hope this helps folk too; I'm not going to fight a battle over links to these sites (and others I've blocked), I'm just trying to improve my own experience of the site.https://hackaday.com/2021/01/08/old-kindle-shows-hdmi-video-...
to make an OK Monitor - https://barwap.com/projects/okmonitor/
I don't think there's a business model there (I suspect the sales would be in the thousands or tens of thousands of dollars -- so no matter where you set your profit margin, you're not covering your time or much beyond costs), but I've sometimes seen things done like that on hobby projects just for impact.
I'd love to have a wireless eInk display for my computer, ideally from a USB-C dongle (so it gets video and power), but HDMI + USB power would be fine too.
You could also use any eink tablet that runs Android with a screen mirroring app.
The $1800 version is exactly what I'd love to have as an extra monitor on my main computer, if not for the price tag. 3200x1800. 25.3". It looks really good. Unfortunately, as is, it's a little outside of my wallet range.
There's a smaller $800 version too. 1650x2200. 13.3". That looks more usable.
To me, a major upside of the OkMonitor is the wireless connectivity. That's very, very nice. Especially if the computer dongle could be made small enough for use with my laptop while traveling, it would be a very nice solution.
Kaleido3 is very usable; the recent waveforms and correct dithering algorithms allow video consumption with limited compromise (the framerate is high). And yes, coding is very doable (Termux provided the compilers/interpreters).
Termux-X11 adds the ability to have your desktop Linux natively on the Android device (so you may not need to use E-Ink displays as part of monitor devices, but already directly as embedded in a tablet used as active computer).
What I've seen of E-Paper displays isn't especially encouraging on the cost front, as similarly-sized displays seem to have roughly comparable costs (~US$800 for a 13.3" display). But at least there should be a technologically-independent option, with the prospect for price competition.
During the day it looks and behaves like E-paper, but with a much faster display rate. It’s also got a warm backlight for use at night.
When the backlight is off the contrast is lower than the E-ink Carta panel used in the Remarkable and Boox tablets, but the backlight and fast refresh really help make up for it.
I’m certainly rooting for them. I hope they have more devices available soon
Have you compared sessions where you're principally, say, reading books with a bookreader app vs. Web browsing, or using other apps?
My experience on the BOOX, an E-ink device, is that web browsing (Einkbro) consumes battery at ~10x the hourly rate that reading books (Neoreader) does. How much of that is active display, and how much is other CPU usage, I don't know.
I assume that none of the difference is in active display; the display is static in either case.
The technologies have a similar appearance, but utilise different technologies (electrophoretic vs. liquid crystal). Principle differences are the responsiveness of the display (LCD is far faster) and power consumption (LCD draws constant power, the display clears when voltage potential is removed, electrophoretic displays persist indefinitely when power is off).
As I'd noted in the comment you're replying to, I've used an E-Ink device for years, and am familiar with its power consumption characteristics.
Finding current specs is challenging, but E-Ink Carta, as of 2013 (over a decade ago) was citing a 15:1 contrast ratio:
<https://wiki.mobileread.com/wiki/E_Ink_Carta>
Edit/Update: A more recent HN comment gives 12:1 as applying to most E-Ink displays as of 2020, with 8:1 being more common: <https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22832452>
I suspect current displays are somewhat better, and I'm seeing a "50% improvement" comment bandied about but without a corresponding contrast ratio. Earlier displays had an 8:1 ratio.
In practice, displays will have worse contrast with additional layers on top of the display, such as a Wacom tablet, capacitive touch, frontlight, and any surface "tooth" treatment.
E-Paper cites a 30:1 ratio, which would be far greater contrast:
<https://www.newvisiondisplay.com/transflective-lcds/>
I've had direct personal experience with E-Ink, but not with transflective LCD tablet displays.
I suspect that in practice the displays are reasonably comparable in terms of contrast.
I had a keyboard kindle that came with a case that included a dim orange pull-out booklight.
I wish we could still get that. It was much more relaxing to read by than the modern uniform white glow from the page itself.
<https://accessorytosuccess.com/blogs/tools/best-book-light-r...>
Give me an actual booklight where the settings are "on" and "off".
(Bizarrely, the light settings on a Kindle Oasis are barely better - since the light is controlled by an internal menu, as opposed to a hardware control, it can't be operated unless you can see the menu. This means that it isn't possible to have the light off during the day and turn it on when it becomes dark - if it's dark, and the light isn't already on, it can't be turned on. My conclusion is that there are no device manufacturers who understand how or why someone might want to use a lamp.)
I suspect that there are simple, single-colour, single-level clip-on lights.
Or, you know, conventional room lighting / reading lights.
A similar thing happened the tech behind Wacom devices--they enjoyed market dominance, the patent ran out, and now we have super cheap high-precision digital art devices.
It’s the main cost driver of my calendar, it basically forces the price point: https://shop.invisible-computers.com/products/invisible-cale...
Any thoughts/plans on allowing a customer to self-host the backend? Or would you publish specs so someone could build their own?
I love the idea of this, and we would love to have one of these in our house, I've just been burned too many times with fully functional physical products bricking because the company behind it goes away.
I know you say you plan to support it for a long time, but everyone says that. :-(
I know everyone says they’ll support their hardware for a long time and then they don’t. And of course I cannot give a guarantee.
But I have no masters to report to. No VCs and no Directors or CFOs.
So if I want to keep the backend running, I can just keep paying 20 Euro a month to Hetzner and keep the server updated.
"Patents" are a conspiracy cited without real evidence. It ignores that *E-INK HAS COMPETITION* (DES/Display Electronic Slurry screens). If E-ink corp were price-gouging then GoodDisplay would have eaten their lunch by now.
To be specific here, the conspiracy isn't that E-Ink patents exist - E-Ink patents do exist (some expired, but E-Ink corp are registering new patents as they innovate), but there are tons of LCD patents also. The conspiracy is the claim that patents are causing price-gouging and high prices that hold up adoption of the tech.
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/6dcc0hLe0mc
frame rate was too bad so i just bought dasung paperwhite :)
"unfortunately I lost the Go source code"
So simple in fact, that it wasn't quickly rewritten and added to GitHub...
/dev/shm
The advantage being that it does not even touch the disk. cdtmp() {
cd $(mktemp -d)
}So I took your tip and now I have
cdtmp() {
local name
name=/tmp/$(diceware --no-caps -d - -n 2)
mkdir $name && cd $name
}
I decided not to worry about the directory existing already, or of the other checks mktemp -d would do for me in my single-user system.. I suppose mktemp -d -t cdtmpXXX would work almost as well. Thanks for the idea!Later disproved by the Banach-Tarski theorem. ;D
Awesome!
E-Ink screens are usually capable of a number of different refresh / display modes, which trade higher-quality visual appearance (crispness, greyscale, ghosting) for slower refresh.
Refresh rates typically range from ~2-4 Hz at highest quality to 16--60 Hz at lower quality, but faster-updating modes. For most E-ink devices I've seen there are typically four modes, "Normal/Regal" (highest quality), "Speed", "A2", and "X-Mode" (fastest refresh).
"Normal" is best for reading static text. "Speed" is sufficient for terminal-based sessions (I have Termux installed on my Onyx BOOX tablet), and most interactive apps (e.g., Web browsers, Podcast apps). I find little practical distinction between "Speed" and "A2". X-Mode does show considerale ghosting, but is indeed capable of video playback.
Typically it's also possible to set the full-refresh interval (now many repaints are premitted between full refreshes which clear ghosting but give a distinct "flash" update.
E-ink has a number of compromises, but is quite usable. Apps which are designed with its capabilities and limitations in mind are much better suited. Mostly that involves full-screen pagination of content rather than scrolling. Given the ubiquitous use of touch-based scrolling in most Mobile applications, this can be somewhat frustrating. I tend to use dedicated e-ink apps (such as Onyx's own NeoReader book reader), apps tuned for E-ink such as Einkbro, a Web browser, or terminal-based apps which work well in a text-based context.
the nice variety of root-access apps you could normally install but unable to run become available after rooting. for many that is enough, without requiring kernel-level changes to make this work. besides this conceptual difference, they both are used interchangeably.
for kindle jailbreaking makes sense as there is no built-in mechanism to support new features/apps.
I use Calibre but hadn't heard of Kavita and I'm not clear what Kavita gives me that I don't already have with Calibre?
Kavita is more like Plex, where when you have your library in something of a decent form it makes using your library a much better experience.
Its also the only tool I know of that handles both manga and ebook libraries well.
Linkrot, in other words.
Documentation in Wiki-based formats is more resilient against this as posts can be subsequently edited.
> random forum bulletin board post
As opposed to a random gist? :)
Next time you do an interesting display mod or port, you can choose whatever video you like.
I get that the original author of the series is above board, but the fandom around touhou is full of enough toxic people that it's often the first thing one encounters or associates with the brand. Kind of like the tug of war with Pepe, but much worse.
I just now did a Google image search for "touhou" (just that term, no quotes) with safe search enabled and you might guess what came back. And these characters are supposed to be children.
I don't want to be a nanny or intrude on people who most likely mean no harm, but if video demos are to have a "standard" test video, should it really be Bad Apple? If you've got something really cool to show off, don't spoil it by associating it with that.