I've always thought that tech websites often start with the wrong thing, with installation instructions front & centre like this one.

If I'm coming to the website looking for that info I'll be happy to dig around a little bit to find it. If I'm coming to the website as a curious observer that information is not useful, it's wasting space that could be used demonstrating _why_ I'd want to install it.

The documentation was hosted on another site, and at least one version of it has moved to https://docs.racket-lang.org/video/index.html. Sadly it says almost nothing - I think this is v0.0 and can't find a way to change that. The more recent documentation source code is at https://github.com/videolang/video/tree/master/video/scribbl... and there are examples at https://github.com/videolang/video/tree/master/video/example... (without any explanation, and they don't seem to do much).

Unsearchable name, Scheme-like syntax, no accessible documentation, no compelling examples ... not much chance of success. Still, the idea of a "language for making movies" is interesting.

Additionally: no sample video (that's what this project is about, right?). And using terms only an ingroup can understand ("what's DrRacket again?")

There are some conference slides linked from project website: https://lang.video/pub/icfp2017/slides.pdf