Firefox is more irrelevant now than IE6 was
gabrielsieben.tech
gabrielsieben.tech
Some of the market share numbers are wrong, because they're based on privacy-violating trackers that Firefox users are more savvy about blocking, rather than (say) `User-Agent` headers.
But that doesn't matter to people who only care about what the trackers and/or ads show.
Can you provide a citation? I don't really buy that; otherwise, the market share numbers would quickly go to 0%. Also, it seems you can easily find online, regardless of source, that Firefox is around ~3%.
Hope they start to innovate again and give us some new ways to use the web. Or at least try, like Arc does. Because their catch-up game with Chrome is a lost cause. No way they can just build a better browser engine.
Firefox in contrast has continued a fairly aggressive level of development, and most importantly supports new standards as they become available (which IE6 in its late life absolutely did not).
Apple Maps meanwhile is in beta and specifically states "Support for additional languages, browsers, and platforms will be expanded over time."
Google and Apple may hold the lead in browser share right now. So did IE 6 at one point. Like Microsoft in the early aughts, Apple has a financial interest in limiting development of the web as a platform (to protect its app store profits and device lock in) and Google has an interest in steering that development in a pro tracking, advertising direction. Firefox is the biggest browser that (I'd argue) is actually well aligned with a robust web growing organically.
Running Fedora in a VM on my Mac mini. Firefox seems to perform much better/less crashy than other browsers.
Brought an old MacBook Pro with drive issues out of mothballs and reinstalled OS X up to Sierra. Got a semi-recent build of Firefox working on it just fine and the computer is now essentially as usable as a Chromebook.
And that's the thing about the web. You can't just point at numbers and say "well, most users are on A, B, and C, so we'll only support those." Some of those users may actually be multi-platform and will get pretty upset when your product is broken in 1 or 2 out of 4 or 5 places they try to use it.
I know a lot of people consider it a sin, but I love it, it works great in Linux.
I switched form Chrome to Firefox some time back and have no regrets. I was ready to be the outlier but to my surprise FF is well supported in the BigCorp tech company that I work for. (Native internal addons are still being developed)
Chrome is not bad but it is not better than FF for the things I’m doing.
I think we also live in a world that is different from the world of IE6 which had a lot of vendor specific stuff. The web today—though not perfectly vendor agnostic—is much more so than before.
Mozilla really need to get its shit together and double down on Firefox development and improvement.
But supposing that it is, what specially do you think FF double down on with respect to catching up with Chrome? Would love to hear what you think the gaps are.