The atmosphere is unpredictable. The ecosystem is teeming with life and a lot of it is animals with their own agency.
Then there’s the whole human factor. If you’re making a vehicle that operates on Earth, you have to be prepared for drunk people and terrorists and all sorts of human contingencies. They’re not causing havoc in deep space.
For better and worse, space is dead.
And on the other-other hand, the things that go wrong in spaceflight usually go wrong on launch or reentry - the parts where you combine the extreme conditions of space with the unpredictable extra nonsense of Earth. Like, say, a cold morning making an O-ring brittle or aerodynamic stresses ripping you apart on reentry. Only three deaths - the crew of Soyuz 11 [2] - have actually occurred in space proper; all other deaths have occurred within the Earth's atmosphere. (Although Apollo 13 came close to adding to that list.)
[1] LEO orbital velocity is ~8 km/s, mach 1 is ~300 m/s, although meteoroids necessarily strike at much higher velocities than that because they're accelerated to at least Earth's escape velocity on descent.
Say you have a 1500 kg car with a 100 hp engine, which starts from a standstill and runs for 5 seconds. How fast will the car be moving at the end of this run? This depends on how much friction the vehicle experiences, and is difficult to accurately predict. Try a similar calculation with a rocket in space, and you can calculate its final speed with a very high degree of certainty.
But now consider the potential impact of a malfunction: if the car engine fails to start, you might be inconvenienced, but you will be fine. On the other hand, if the rocket engine fails to ignite in space, you can't perform necessary orbital maneuvers and you might be in deep trouble.
It's something about environment on Earth being fundamentally hospitable to human life, and environment in space being similarly inhospitable. Because of this, malfunctions and unpredictable system dynamics on Earth are most often just minor inconveniences, while malfunctions in space / underwater / deep underground are disastrous events.
On a smaller but more relatable scale: it's like the difference between a car or a train, and an airplane. When you have a malfunction on a car or a train, an appropriate response is just to stop; when you have a malfunction on an airplane, you can't just stop, you have to keep things working long enough to get to land before you can stop.
One is mildly inconvenient, the other is deathly inconvenient. Yes, many aspects of the extraterrestrial environment are predictable, but the consequences for being wrong are far greater.
And as another has noted, most deaths during space flight actually occurred in the atmosphere anyway.
Is this a pitch for a near-Earth Uber service?
The mechanism to run the net can break. It has broken during flight before. At that point you have to put on an arm-length glove, stick your hand in the tank, then smash all the feces up against the wall of the tank manually.
You need to do this because at a certain point if you open the toilet to use it there's a very good chance you'll get something floating _out_ of the toilet.
Free floating zero-g human waste is an absolute nightmare.
The proper version of Murphy Law, which seems missing on Wikipedia is ~ "If a part can be installed in more than one position, it will be incorrectly installed in the field given enough time"
It is almost last on the mitigating risk pyramid, training people to do things properly. PPE is the only one lower.
To apply it here, would be "inadvertently stepping on it". They chose to train staff not to step on it.
You can't mitigate all risk, maybe it was the best choice.