so if deepfake would be generated with distinctive indication that this is AI generated forgery then it would be ok? for example cyborg hand or palm and everything else like real person.
But most people producing fake celeb porn are making images that, at first glance, look exactly like [celeb], and only on careful inspection do you see AI-telltales like wrong numbers of fingers. Easy to miss. The law is saying that these realistic images are not OK and the person depicted in them can sue, no matter how many disclaimers you add to the picture. It applies to well-made photoshops created by humans just as much as AI slop.
> regardless of whether the visual depiction indicates, through a label or some other form of information published with the visual depiction, that the visual depiction is not authentic
Otherwise, parody and criticism using AI would be limited.