But the human element is quite related.

Consider the following:

A) One of your co-workers touches you inappropriately without your consent.

B) One of your co-workers distributes pornographic images of you to your peers without your consent.

It's easy to say that "touching" and "distributing images" are not "the same thing", and also both scenarios are blatant sexual harassment.

Not sure if if you're just not understanding what the comment you replied to is saying or if your are just responding in bad faith.

The comment doesn't say the 2 are the same. They say that both should fall under your consent because they are either your actual body or a depiction of it...

Not sure how taht can be any clearer.