This headline is kind of misleading. It's actually someone's personal (educated) opinion on a blog, not a statement of fact. Should be something more like "I think CrowdStrike will be liable" or "CrowdStrike should be liable"
the full headline (at this time at least) is more nuanced than seen here in hn: CrowdStrike will be liable for damages in France, based on the OVH precedent.
It's also in the URL. Submitter, please don't remove important parts of headlines.
Doesn’t really make it any less misleading. It is still just an opinion.
No, because the current title can be misinterpreted as a statement of fact. And you know that.