I sincerely hope not.
I have incisor teeth passed down to me from generation upon generation of my previous kin all the way back to my stoneage ancestors.
Incisors are specifically designed for tearing and ripping meat.
I eat real meat!
I have incisor teeth passed down to me from generation upon generation of my previous kin all the way back to my stoneage ancestors.
Incisors are specifically designed for tearing and ripping meat.
I eat real meat!
Even if it were true - it isn't, incisors are for cutting grass and fruits too - humans are more than anything, adaptable, and our survival and evolution sits on the top of that adaptability.
We are who we are because, between other things, we eat whatever is available and plenty.
If meat becomes a luxury product, and/or becomes even more dangerous to the environment to the point it's even less sustainable, the proper naturalist argument would be we shall need to adapt and stop eating meat altogether.
Às I said, though, I'm quite fond of my Picanha, and sincerely hope I can get to eat a sustainable version of it at some point in my life so I can do it with a bit less of a guilt.
Cultivated meat IS real meat from meat cells, it is not a meat imitation based on soy, wheat or whatever. Potentially much safer. Think of dead zombie disease or suspected cancer risk of beef.
https://www.gesundheitsindustrie-bw.de/en/article/news/new-p...
https://publichealth.gmu.edu/news/2024-03/should-you-be-worr...
Why do animals have to suffer for our meat supply?
“As long as there are slaughter houses there will always be battlefields.” ― Leo Tolstoy
(The quote sounds batter in other languages, since battlefields are "slaughter fields")
Best, Beijinger, not a vegetarian
If you want to direct your rage somewhere, direct it at the people who force these animals into concentration camp like environments to maximize production. That's the true evil, not eating meat.
How did someone say? To kill someone, cut off his head and build a nice vase out of it is called culture. To have to go to prison for it is called civilization.
Besides that, raising animals for meat is terrible energy inefficient.
No, not for me, for Bhuddists (I think they regard all life as sacred), and (depending on the animal and if mere prohibition rather than the justification for that prohibition is important) Jews, Muslims, and Hindus.
Hence saying "which".
What's energy inefficient is trying to grow a thousand cows in a feedlot.
I would give cultivated meat a try but I don't see it becoming a staple of my diet. A hamburger sounds good about now.
And i see at some point convergence of technologies - human transplant growing would be pretty much the same tech, just the options in the app would be different, like how much kevlar to add into the heart muscle.
;)
Kept one and turned it into a necklace.
(2) If cultivated meat becomes affordable, it's actually made of meat. The same stuff, just from a vat rather than a body.
This can easily be much more diverse, because suddenly all the endangered species, a few extinct species, and human flesh(!) legally get on the menu.
It's the wonderful confection of oppositional defiant disorder and performative assholery that attempts to piss off the performer's mental model of some other person, usually for influencer points and political point-scoring.