Re: Do people IRL know you have a blog?
lars-christian.com
lars-christian.com
I’ve been lucky to have been recognized by a few people in the wild (IRL) who walked up to me and asked, “You are brajeshwar.com?”
These days, I just write for myself.
Fast forward 15+ years, my daughter somehow decided to search the Internet for me, and she said, “You are like a ChatGPT-powered Discord bot, answering questions on an antique Reddit forum.”
Reading this term hit my brain with such a sudden wave of nostalgia. It really was a different time.
Now people talk about high engagement twitter threads, linked-in posts or just film each other filming each other for their "content".
I do like however personnal pages that have a small log mentionning the updates to which I can subscribe to.
A lot of that is a flaw in the blogging software and the failure of the author to realize they need to customize the design to make it accessible to readers.
The biggest hurdle of moving away from a blog to a static format is that blog posts are timestamped and there's no real expectation that they're maintained. With static pages, however, I try to keep them up-to-date.
See here the personal homepage of the late Sheldown Brown, famous for his technical articles on bicycle maintenance, that is still maintained by his spouse Harriett Fell[1] who still add content regularly. I still visit once in a while: https://www.sheldonbrown.com/org/personal-pages.html
It may look like a big mess and it is ugly by modern standards[2] but it is a real pleasure to visit with tons of articles classed by topics. I find it more interesting to visit than a blog.
Here some humor pages Harriett Fell added in recent year to make fun of Zwift or OpenAI:
https://www.sheldonbrown.com/time-travel.html
https://www.sheldonbrown.com/openai.html
[1] which also happen to have her own personal page: https://www.khoury.northeastern.edu/home/fell/
[2] it doesn't have to be, this one simply was built in the late 90's
You don't need dated entries, just a topic name, a few subheadings for different parts of related text, and a history page; but presenting update notifications can still be a problem? maybe different levels of notification, or subscribing to specific articles(subheading)/topics?
There's a reason why LinkedIn reads like garbage, and even if it's obvious, people neither point it out or stop.
I know it puts off some people who mistake that for anonymity and think this is ruining the web, that people can't behave if they aren't talking under their own name, I respect that.
I am not looking for anonymity. I don't pretend to hide from authorities. However pseudonimity allows me to express myself while not engaging my current or future employers directly.
Its interesting that we got to a point where anyone would consider anonymity to be ruining the web.
When I was growing up in the 90s and early 00s anonymity online was the whole point. Everything online was behind usernames, and usernames weren't expected to be connected to your real identity at all.
Thank you Facebook, you did a wonderdul job of convincing an entire generation that they should put their real name, profile photo, hometown, etc online and tied to everything they say online.
You consider that the norm because that's what you grew up with.
Before then, people would sign everything on the internet (and its predecessor networks) with their real names, work/home addresses, phone numbers, and more.
That's why when you create a new user on a *nix box, it asks for that information.
Correct me if I'm wrong here because it is before my time, but prior to WWW wasn't the common use for the internet government and academic research, and technical communications of those actually building the internet protocols? Unless I'm wrong there, I just wouldn't really lump that in when comparing how the average person uses the internet.
FWiW shitposting on UseNet started very early on - binary porn coming from German airbases was a thing and while many official things were sent from @MyRealName there were plenty of handles used and an0n postings.
Or, consider Publius as the author of the Federalist papers, a pseudonym for Hamilton, Madison, and John Jay.
> That's why when you create a new user on a *nix box, it asks for that information.
That's your local account, not information that is visible to anyone outside of your network.
There are a lot of unix tools to ask networks to query that information and they'll happily do it for other unix systems they connect to. When I was in college in the last 90s, I'd often lookup phone numbers and such of students at other universities using command line unix utilities.
Or do you mean shared mainframes with many users on the same system? That'd still be local to the system, you just happened to have access to that system.
Are you sure you're not just thinking of ldap/directory lookups?
That was the early 1980s as I recall them.
I haven't run across this sentiment with regard to personal websites or blogs. Who is saying that?
I do see it for forums, comment sections, and social media. Those often bring together people who did not consciously seek to interact with each other, and do tend to reward antisocial behavior with attention.
As a student (who also has no corporate experience), I share this feeling. The few times I've been asked by other students about my blog, I've always been excited (perhaps a little too much) to share my thoughts and opinions in a conservation.
My address is on my profile here on HN
The only reason I don't have a blog yet is inertia/laziness. It'll happen eventually.
Now I’m working through my backlog of drafts, dumping a load of stuff ASAP, and then trying to commit myself to some form of publishing schedule to force myself to “catch up” on the project backlog.
I just spend the past month rebuilding my blog, even though there’s nobody reading it and it really only is my “online home” to play around with and be creative.
My main source of traffic is random Google visits for some “I’ll write this down for myself in case I run into it again” type posts.
Justin Searls (fairly known in Ruby and Rails community) mostly quit a lot of various social channels though publishes on some of them one direction. He started a podcast that wasn't meant to be guests of some specific topic, it's just him updating you on things. What he's working on, what he's learning, random stories, etc. - https://justin.searls.co/casts/
Brandur who I've worked with at a couple of places (Heroku previously, and now Crunchy Data) who writes great technical pieces that often end up here also has more of a personal newsletter. While there are technical pieces in there at times he'll also talk about personal experiences my favorite one is some of the unique experiences hiking the Pacific Trail (https://brandur.org/nanoglyphs/039-trails).
I blog for work. I don't discuss it with family. I think I'd find it very stressful answering the "why did you say that" questions.
The corollary of this, is that I write notes by hand in almost every meeting I attend, and never ever read them again -But for things like IETF I do a mixture of .org and meetecho (markdown) because there is at least some possibility others may get value from the shared log in meetecho, and I know I will use the .org to .. write the blog.
Or alternatively it could be a place for educational stuff like the more detailed answers on stackoverflow. Except the middleman gets removed
For example: for years I was using Pythons requests library incorrectly. The way I was doing it worked - but it wasn’t correct.
Once I published a short blog on the correct way - the correct way seemed to stick better in my mind!
Usually I prefer a git repo for this kind of thing
No post I’ve written has ever gone viral.
I also have a personal website. If anyone notice what I've written it's a very nice added bonus. For me it's also about personal ownership of my content, and perhaps also a reminder to myself of the old internet - which I miss.
My opinion on blogging is do it for yourself, not to achieve something. That way it doesn't feel like wasted effort when nobody reads it and it can still be fun or cathartic to write.
Hope you find some more things that bring joy.
(I know platitudes are grating, but I thought you might want to know someone is rooting for you.)
That’s not necessarily negative. I’ll sometimes say that to myself when I’m feeling down as a way of freeing myself from whatever thoughts are feeling too heavy. I’m not really into stoicism, but I think it’s what memento mori is getting at.
I have been running the same website, which has undergone several redesigns, for 25 years and counting.
It is also interesting about having a personal domain name. People pause when you give the email. No, I really did mean first@lastname.com. Yes, I've had this for decades. My sister tells a different variant, she at least once had someone comment on it and then stand up straight - which she interpreted as being a little impressed as if my sister was a celebrity or something. Very interesting in a world where most people do not have a domain with their family name.
The challenge for me has been that over time it morphed from a personal site, to a professional site, to a corporate site. Now that I have employees and this work supports my family I have less freedom to do just anything I want with it. It has to be on topic. That constraint does also bring freedom in its own way. I do not have a good place for personal interests that are not related to my cybersecurity work any longer though.
At least, I think that's what my wife's reaction is before she leaves the room to find a book to read. And my friends who think a blog is just part of my weird, personal brand, like using a phone with a keyboard.
Everybody there is online, and blogs are widely read. Much more than in the US.
My philosophy on this is that anything worth saying, that isn’t some tepid opinion about pizza or your pet, will probably irritate some people. And while the internet isn’t forever, it’s got a fairly long memory.
I was surprised to find that some workplace acquaintances and even students read my blog. A colleague out-of-the-blue messaged me about some python function I'd written (https://bcmullins.github.io/parsing-json-python/). A student asked about reading recommendations and how I choose books. So people you know IRL may be reading your stuff (or some of it) but just not mentioning it.
As another post mentioned, I feel much more pressure about my writing after learning that IRL people read it.
Just the other day a colleague at work was searching the web and eventually ended up in a blog post of mine. He was enthusiastic that he had "discovered" my blog. It was fun.
I like this guy is doing his own thing.
I struggle to understand what this means, as I dont know what "building a brand" means when a person does it.
In reality an interesting topic is one where the answers are unknown. You might be biased or super objective, you might carefully compare theories and evidence on both sides or perspectives of an argument or theory. At some point you will have the tendency to include what YOU think about it. It doesn't matter what that is, you will lose readers.
Perhaps you welcome Jesus in your life or reject him. One could switch between those two every other week and if that is what is on ones mind one should just talk about it. Talk about it often enough and you will build an audience of similar doubt while some Christians and atheist won't stick around.
For those with more patience or sufficiently impressed with your other writings you need only repeat the "offense" often enough.
Surely a thoughtful person should have an opinion about every empire, corporation or ideology murdering, maiming or torturing people? If you are completely indifferent about it, that would be your opinion.
Disclose your opinion and those who don't agree wont be amused. You have to actively avoid the topic which isn't easy as everything in the universe is connected.
You can be Steve Jobs, that doesn't mean you can just talk about alternative medicine. Facts have nothing to do with it.
I can write cookie cutter stuff that everyone can read (perhaps even enjoy!) but my private thoughts gravitate straight towards the controversy and I ponder those things deeply, sometimes for decades. If I mistakenly write those thoughts down Best I can hope for is an audience of anger. If you talk about something it means you must believe in it.
Someone on twitter just asked what the rope hanging from the American flag is. I got a 12 hour ban for saying "I dunno, it seems enough rope to hang yourself?"
That is your free speech absolutism sandwich all bagged up for ya. ha-ha
These can come about naturally through some amount of fame, naturally through having a natural talent for something that generates interest in you and your opinions, or you can grind for it in a kind of numbers game.
If you are working towards getting your name "out there" and having some of that sense of recognition, if you're hustling for subscribers or follows, if you are following trends to post about in order to try to get more readers, you're behaving in brand-building exercises.
If you're just writing for the sake of writing, or to keep a journal for your future self, or just so your close friends can keep up with you, you're not.
I think it's about intent. Everyone builds a brand to a degree just by being themselves online, but some people do it with an intent to capitalize on it and it often come through in their work in a way that can be distasteful.
Even the IRL people know I have a blog, but I guess it kinda comes up since I also run a blogging platform.
But random strangers do! At least, if you're contributing something to the world which is wonderful and useful.
In my experience, the posts which get the most traffic are simply not going to be the ones you think they will be. I am thinking of both my public and internal blog posts at my company - the most read articles are dumb basic shit that nobody thought to write down (but should have), and my greatest masterpieces languor in obscurity.
What is a Presentation of Self? It comes the book The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life by Erving Goffman.
The two primary senses of humans are sight and vision. If you take the time to write down and enumerate the ways by which people understand the internal state of others, you realize that a computer simply communicates impressions of people over long distances, some of which have limited correspondence with who a person really is. Photos could be fake. Videos could be scripted and a certain impression. You don't really see someone for who they are except in real life, talking to them for a duration.
Most people talk to or avoid certain people internally based on how they act and what they say. But once you realize the structure of communication, you feel like a robot talking to others. What was implicit becomes explicit.
So yes, a website matters, if the increasing trends for humans and human ability are greater knowledge consumption, production, network communication over locality, and so on. It reveals your internal perception, taste, intelligence, and processing of information, by which people use to judge you and ask how relation to you improves the group fitness.
Having a website selects for intellectualism. Social media is also a presentation. The question could be rephrased: Do people know you have a TikTok or Instagram?
People such as his wife and digital people have increasingly different lifestyles and diverge. Had the author made his way to a metropole or more major place, it's likely having a personal brand would've mattered more.
And that makes me smile because on the one hand people keep repeating that blogs are dead, but on the other you're all proof that it's clearly not the case.
My blog: https://brontosaurusrex.github.io/
I post them all to Goodreads as well. Hardly anyone read them on my own blog.
It's convenient for me to have them all in one spot so I can export them and whatnot.
I've had one review that a successful blogger (now substacker) linked to and that probably resulted in more than half the hits the blog ever got coming in about two weeks.
Posting to Goodreads people seem to appreciate more. My reviews get some reaction a few times a week there.
A few people IRL know about my blog and reviews on Goodreads. I don't generally tell people about it but if people really read and it comes up I tell people.
I keep it largely separate from my Twitter account and Linked In profile.
Yeah because reviews there are put into context of other reviews. I never google for book reviews, because I expect mostly spam. I always go directly to goodreads or amazon.
Many years later, one coworker has a website under construction, and others say they have nothing to say online. When i bring up a blog post I wrote years ago, relevant to a conversation, I feel like a charlatan trying to sell a product.
But hey, I'm happy to write in the dark. Especially after some of my posts have literally landed me on TV. I felt like everything I Wrote after was scrutinized. But the world has forgotten about me so I'm free again.
Influencing killed it. Nowadays people bring up their online presence when they want views, impressions, and subscriptions, when they are trying to bump follower count.
I got a job and started (over)working. Bugs/exploits in the PHP framework I was using took the site down a few times. Maintenance lagged, and I eventually zipped everything and shut it down.
I've found a better work life balance over the years, but just haven't connected the dots to ever doing something new with it. I think the last attempt foundered on picking a static site generator.
Most of my IRL friends and family barely use Facebook so I'm pretty sure few were ever very aware of what was on there.
My first site actually started as what we'd now call a static site generator back in the 1990s. Then PHP a few years later, then Python built on webpy.org (including an admin interface), and now back to a static site generator.
Most of my friends are computer people, and know and occasionally read my blog. My non computer friends could not care less.
I attach it to my CV so I keep it professional enough for someone else to look at that I would want to impress, but still pretty casual because I try to write like I'm explaining it to a friend, someone who knows basic programming stuff but is a novice to the actual topic of the article
So right now, I'm quite happy with how it's going and I have a list of articles to write. But writing a post takes multiple hours, so I don't know what the frequency will be on the long run.
Formally, it's an exercise in learning the W3C Accessibility standards, but the content is very much "write for yourself".
In general, I find I compartmentalize a lot, and there are very few people in my life who are part of multiple compartments.
Most of them don’t care for the topics I write about. However, they usually get a little excited, as if they found a real-life Easter egg.
Too bad Susanna Clarke got CFS, a very ill researched illness :/
There are maybe tens of millions of software engineers, designers, product managers, entrepreneurs and other tech-adjacent workers in the world. HN is one of the most popular tech sites among hardcore techies, at least in my circles.
And yet the top posts of all time get thousands of upvotes. Add 10x lurkers and you get tens of thousands of users. That's still 0.1% of the total above.
I was a successful blogger in the 00th years and with a side business around Made for Adsense because once you understood SEO it was inevitable, if this rings a bell.
Reading a blog seems magical. Just imagine “Do ppl IRL my print magazine?” to use another metaphor. Nope and yes. Same goes for artists, say singer and songwriters: “Do you listen to my stuff?” Why should they?
Understanding your readers and fans is not easy. Statistically speaking, if all your close friends read your blog, you either are on to something or you get lied to.
So if all around read your blog you might be some truly impressive author with a huge fan base - and 99,9999% won’t fit in here.
As a side note, I still know quite a fraction of successful YouTubers. They are publishers, content creators. It is work for them, maybe evolved from something they did for fun. These dudes always prioritize money now - because they know their niche a bit better now and want to appeal to it.
[1]: https://jvns.ca/blog/2018/02/20/measuring-blog-success/
* How do I rent a motorcycle in Taiwan?
* What's a coding bootcamp like?
* What's your emacs config?
* Got any book recommendations?
* You got into Raw? How was it?
* Didn't you parents come to Taiwan? Mine are coming next month, what did you do with them?
etc. I'm constantly dropping links to people at networking events or when they come into my restaurant. I also just forget things constantly and so my blog is basically my external brain.
Unless you walk on eggs more carefully than in Stalin's Russia and only talk of weather and puppies, you are liable for being torn apart by an angry mob of mediocres who finds fulfilment in destroying a defenseless guy's life.
I'd say I'm banned, shadow banned/flagged, or otherwise censured on social media all the time.