> No one “loves” Teams, but honestly it serves its purpose for us at no cost.
Of course there's a cost, its just hidden and you are forced to pay it. Microsoft used its monopoly position to move into a new market.
Of course there's a cost, its just hidden and you are forced to pay it. Microsoft used its monopoly position to move into a new market.
The person approving the $1 million dollar budget item doesn’t really care that Teams isn’t “free” in the sense that there is no free lunch, and while they perhaps have moral qualms of antitrust, that’s outside their purview. We’re locked into Office suite and right now there is no extra charge for Teams.
Microsoft did a massively illegal thing (again) and got away with it
Time to hold companies responsible for their suppliers.