If you could run this on say, stock CPU that would increase the use cases dramatically, but if you still need a 4090 I’m either missing something or this is useless.
If you could run this on say, stock CPU that would increase the use cases dramatically, but if you still need a 4090 I’m either missing something or this is useless.
That's without the context window, so depending on how much context you want to use you'll need some more GB.
That is, assuming you'll be using llama.cpp (which is standard for consumer inference. Ollama is also llama.cpp, as is kobold)
This thing will run fine on a 16GB card, and a q6 quantization will run fine on a 12GB card.
You'll still get good performance on an 8GB card with offloading, since you'll be running most of it on the gpu anyway.
Supposedly Mistral NeMo better than Llama-3-8b, which is the more apt comparison, although benchmarks usually don't tell the full story; we'll see how it does on the LMSYS Chatbot Arena leaderboards. The other (huge) advantage of Mistral NeMo over Llama-3-8b is the massive context window: 128k (and supposedly 1MM with RoPE scaling, according to their HF repo), vs 8k.
Also, this was trained with 8bit quantization awareness, so it should handle quantization better than the Llama 3 series in general, which will help more people be able to run it locally. You don't need a 4090.