A New HTTP Status Code for Legally-restricted Resources
tbray.org
tbray.org
Also further to this how frequently are new HTTP Status Codes proposed like this and what percentage are/aren't "accepted"? Not sure if I should add it to http://httpstatus.es or not (with some sort of "proposed" signal)
451 is OK for propaganda purposes, but will people outside of North America and the UK understand the context?
Of course one can argue that censorship is only temporary and that actually it would make sense for clients to keep trying..
And yes people here in Finland understand the context.
How very, very appropriate. I suspect Mr. Bradbury would approve, and this will stand a nice tribute to his influence.
Given the prevalence (editorial: "enormity") of censorship problems -- both current and pending -- being able to distinguish between them and other failures provides actionable information on a useful scale and frequency.
The particular response code proposed does make an elegantly concise and culturally cognizant statement -- something that RFC's are not entirely unknown for. The proposal is both practical and well-put, IMHO.