Thinly veiled advertisement for a competing product/service.
GuardDuty does what AWS says it will do. This article moves the goal posts in order to judge it as inadequate.
GuardDuty does what AWS says it will do. This article moves the goal posts in order to judge it as inadequate.
What do you view as AWS' commitments around GuardDuty? I see pretty clear positioning by AWS of GuardDuty as a one-and-done solution for threat detection.
Top level marketing claims include:
* "Protect against ransomware and other types of malware" - which is why I looked at how viable GuardDuty would be against the most common form of S3 "ransomware"
* "Detect suspicious activity in your generative AI workloads" - but they don't actually have coverage of the vast majority of GenAI Services
* "Continuous monitoring across AWS accounts and workloads without added cost" - except the service is expensive (if worthwhile for the foundational data sources!) and has unpredictable costs
> competing product/service
I see canary infrastructure as complimentary to Guardduty (w/ foundational data sources) - which is explicitly stated in the piece!
nb: I'm the author, in case it's non-obvious!