I think this was just normal math exposition but presumably more labor intensive to produce. We get a sequence of generic graphical containers for blurbs of text (e.g. an image of an open booklet, a sign, a spiral-bound notebook), and speech bubbles from unnamed, featureless non-characters. As a comic, it's shallow and uncreative. There are some diagrams, but these would just as easily have been at home in any other didactic presentation. I think the only benefit the "comic" format gives is that it pressured the authors to be punchy, breaking the material into small chunks that fit into these graphical elements. That's good -- but the same small chunks could have been packaged in some other form just as easily.
https://www.smbc-comics.com/comic/2013-08-20