Spending other people's money is fantastic, equitable, fair. 20% additional tax on yourself? Cruel, unfair, inequitable.
Spending other people's money is fantastic, equitable, fair. 20% additional tax on yourself? Cruel, unfair, inequitable.
Evidence: I live in Europe, not the USA, by choice, so I AM paying 20% extra tax and enjoying it.
The ideological difference there is that, in general, conservatives and libertarians prefer to minimize confiscation by force, and believe that society is best served by voluntary charities vs authoritarian taxation.
I.e. "I know how to spend my money better than the government, and I know how to help my community better than someone located thousands of miles away that don't know my neighbors or their problems".
[1] https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S00490...
It might be worth taking a minute to understand what they actually believe, you may be surprised to find that even though they aren't part of whatever tribe you're in, that they are very reasonable people who also want the best for everyone.
> they project this tendency of theirs onto left-wingists to whom it doesn't actually apply.
Mmmm really. Here's an embarrassing article the Guardian had to write when just days after attacking Tesco for reducing its tax bill, it was discovered that the Guardian Media Group was doing exactly the same thing:
https://www.theguardian.com/help/insideguardian/2008/mar/06/...
Excuses offered included "The leader was written before journalists knew of the structure of the Emap purchase", "The relationship between the Guardian and GMG is a complicated one" and "the [Scott] trust was established in 1936 to avoid paying double death duties and ensure the continued existence of the paper".
Even Labour controlled local councils have been caught finding clever ways to reduce their tax bill, and they're a part of the government:
https://www.politicshome.com/news/article/embarrassment-for-...
Doesn't get more left wingist than the Guardian and Labour.