MySpace to Make $800 million+ in FY2008
mashable.com
mashable.com
What if MySpace is just reinvesting a lot right now. Or they're an incompetent non-technology company that doesn't know how to run things efficiently. There's no reason they couldn't be making a lot more profit. That's probably just not the main goal this early, although maybe it should be given the rise of Facebook.
That's pretty clear from the way things at MySpace break all the time. It's also the reason I trust them more than Facebook.
If anything, the fact that mySpace is only profitable to the tune of 1.8% strengthens my argument. Sure, they may still be in a heavy investment phase, but I honestly expected a higher margin than that.
>There's no reason they couldn't be making a lot more profit.
No kidding, but if you and I think that, why aren't they?
> ...why aren't they?
Likely MySpace is much more interested in strengthening their position through reinvestment than trying to extract profits this early in the game. That's responsible and good business, even if they fail at it. Why does this surprise you?
Murdoch paid slightly over a year's revenues for mySpace. That's not a bad deal (actually it's pretty sweet if you think there is a long term chance of success), but that thin profit margin is really worrying.
What's more worrying is that mySpace was sold by people who thought that yearly revenue + $10M was a good deal. When even your basic deal starts at 3x yearly revenue, one wonders why they sold so low.
If mySpace is investing to the point of razor thin profit margins now, they must either really have something up their sleeves, or are not as healthy as thought.
With the humor of Will Ferrel in Anchorman let's "Agree to disagree."
Did you see this today on TC though... check out Woody's comment, #25. Interesting given the topic at hand, don't ya think?
Link: http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/08/09/wow-clown-co-got-that-1...