Hacker News Reader

> what have you got?

you've got a discipline that isn't quite a science, but usually makes a best effort to resemble one.

Which still ends up better than the wild ravings of uneducated conspiracists.

Or the calculated lies of propagandists. The fact that ancient histories were written with an agenda in mind may be true, but that does not mean they are improved by adding further layers of ‘constructed truth,’ IE, lies.

You are only imitating the homeopaths and creationists here.

You are technically describing your interpretation. Careful, the supernatural can be found in what would seem like the very most unlikely places.

Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.

Do you have some of that for "the supernatural" ?

Do you have proof that you are omniscient?

didn't say I was. And the fact that you dodged the question kinda indicates your answer is "no."

Perhaps I misinterpreted you.

What is the intended meaning of: "You are only imitating the homeopaths and creationists here"?

Reply on news.ycombinator.com