Maybe you could start by replying to my email? I would not have complained publicly if there had been any form of communication from you but there was none.
(What you're describing as our policy is certainly not our policy; these are extraordinarily distinctive circumstances.)
Y'all are doing some cool technical work, but this insistence on "either give us consent to air your dirty laundry in public or else we won't respond to you at all" raises a pretty big red flag. I'm sure there was a perfectly good reason for banning his account (I'd guess something to do with the VPN endpoint he said he was running on it), but this doesn't seem like a particularly reasonable way of handling it.
Just to keep this perfectly clear: we do not have a system that automatically deletes flagged accounts, and what happened here was not an error on our part.