Some people forget that everyone is innocent until proven guilty.
Some people forget that when they signed up to a service, they granted the service provider the right to decide when to cease providing the service, at the service provider's discretion.
What are you trying to hide, you seditious terrorist, hmm?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aptronym https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/atrox#Latin https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/atrocity
Rights = Duties
If you break this symmetry, now we can look at YOU. Why should we all respect YOUR presumption of innocence if you don't respect others?
If the response is some stereotype related crap I don't want to hear it.
I don't buy duality as you present. Two points is just an invitation and opportunity to envision interpolations, extrapolate some spectral scales, wondering about additional dimensions, and fathom how it might interfere with the rest of our representations.
Rights and left are just two points. Intimate mind experiences can modulate interpolations in-between.
Duty and rights are all parts of the same object, it's just a matter of perspective that can make them appear to be separated consideration. Just like creation and constraints. Nothing exists without ontological restrictions that allows its form to happen.
The person banned from Skype could have been an American dual citizen, nondenominational Christian, calling the Gaza strip from a phone with an American flag case, while listening to country music, from a pickup truck, with multiple bald eagle tattoos, while holding a can of American light beer. Or could have been someone else. There is no way of knowing.