The great silence: Just 4 in 10k galaxies may host intelligent aliens
space.com
space.com
That said, so many of these ‘intelligent life’ things have so many baked in assumptions, I’m constantly frustrated: “Must be water based, since that’s what we know,” “Must communicate via radio like we do in ways that we could recognize”, … The assumptions are legion.
We can’t even imagine alien alien.
This one is an assumption, but it's a pretty good one.
Equilibrium chemistry has a fairly narrow band of energy in which things can be pushed to one side or the other without completely dissociating. A solvent is almost always required as a medium and water is about as "simple" as that gets.
Sub-zero chemistries might work, but they would be much slower than water--life might take longer than the age of the universe to evolve. Molten chemistries don't seem to be able to hang together long enough to be reversible.
While the "building blocks" of life might be different, given our current knowledge of physics, the probability that the solvent for life is water is likely very high.
You’ll need a lot of energy for complex life. The list of things that can naturally provide enough without having extremely-hostile side effects is pretty much limited to stars, and then only if you get really lucky in a whole bunch of ways.
Then you need to turn that into chemical energy to actually do anything with it.
That’s gonna turn useful chemicals from the environment into waste you can no longer use. If you’re lucky the waste is chemically useful, and if something can evolve to use it, maybe it can turn it back into what you need (happened with oxygen). If the waste isn’t useful, you better hope your planet’s recycling it somehow. Ideally with some kind system that adjusts with a feedback-loop so it doesn’t limit your growth too much.
Our one example sure looks extremely fragile, in that if you mess with any of several things a little bit, you might still get life, but it’ll cyclically wipe itself out, or never be able to harvest enough energy to support complex life, or any number of other problems that end in not seeing intelligence arise.
I fully agree with your second paragraph though.
This is a bold interpretation. Could be a sign of many things. Like that life is much rarer than we assume. Could be that all civilizations run into some kind of energy trap or that civilizations tend to destroy themself with technology
“Must be water based, since that’s what we know,”
No scientist says that they MUST be water based, but water based would be a decent assumption since we know life can be water based. To look for life in general: look for entropy sources.
https://www.sciencealert.com/entropy-could-be-the-secret-to-...
That said, if, say in a billion years, we survive as a race, and still haven't met anyone, then some of those drake choices are very different than we imagine them -- and we must have somehow gotten really lucky, or there is something else very strange going on. Regardless, it would likely be pretty bad news to a single-planet lifeform to meet us at that point, or at least tectonic, depending on how altruistic society as a whole would be at the time of the meeting.
Given radio waves being the primary marker for our own existence and looking at the distance those artificial signals already travelled compared to the size of the cosmos, I believe not having any form of indication for intelligent or any alien life is a surprise.
Roll the in the idea we'll communicate with them with messages encoded in radio waves, and they'll understand, and it sounds hopelessly optimistic.
Earth is home to just one species who've developed wireless communication, and we don't broadcast across astronomical distances if we can help it these days.
It is very probable that electromagnetic waves are what you start with.
My point is that this limits our search somewhat to just interstellar species, and that's a crazy high bar!
The most advanced species we know (us) is still confined to one planet. We'd be difficult to impossible to detect from Alpha Centauri, let alone Andromeda.
If someone sent you raw radio data, what's it modulated by? Frequency? Phase? Amplitude? A combination of the three? Is it multiplexed with other data? And then, if you magically figure that out, it's not even in a language you speak? If it's even a spoken language!
Good luck haha.
Communicating like this must be what it's like being an LLM trying to understand your training data.
Perhaps we just missed the signals?
Let's ponder some timescales. The Earth has been around ~4.5 billion years, life began a half billion to a billion years later. It wasn't until about 2 million years ago that the species that was to evolve into modern humans started to use fire. That's 3.498 billion years or so of life before what we might considered civilization.
Humans first started using radio about 125 years ago. An instant in cosmic timescales. Powerful broadcast radio signals first showed up in 1930s. We are already starting to transition to lower power point-to-point wireless transmission. That means our radio waves are become far less detectable at stellar distances. Give it another 25 or 50 years and humans might well have gone silent, for all practical purposes, to hypothetical aliens.
To have another advanced civilization arise both within detection distance of Earth and in an overlapping instant of time where we might detect each other? The odds are unfathomably tiny.
Furthermore it also makes no sense to just scream in all directions so you will use highly directed microwave beam or laser. If you are not in the path of such communication, you will hear silence.
For example, once upon a time "tool use" was considered a unique capability of humans, and from that was derived definitions of intelligence, etc. Well, turns out lots of other animals use tools, at least under that original, somewhat simplistic definition. But what's the significance of that fact--that other animals use tools? Does it mean they're also intelligent, just like humans? People have argued as much, but the "tool use" test was basically pulled out of someone's butt to begin with; the fact we all agree other animals use tools, now, doesn't actually imply much of anything.
People draw conclusions where none can be drawn. And people establish presumptions and definitions to fit their preferred conclusions.
In furtherance of my point. We struggle enough with interpersonal communication. Communication with intelligent animals, of which the examples are many and diverse, has to this point been unmanageable.
What is lonelier, having no other intelligence for millions of light years, or knowing there's another civilization tantalizingly close, but still far enough to make the possibility of in-person contact daunting under known laws of physics.
Life might be common, but “intelligent” life? That seems to be exceedingly rare.
Many of them have probably had ample time to travel the galaxy.
"by plugging this value into the Drake equation, Stern and Gerya arrive at a value for the number of extraterrestrial civilizations as somewhere between 0.0004 and 20,000".
EDIT: If we take a number near the middle, say 1, we have ~1 per galaxy. Near the high side, we have ~10k per galaxy.