Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 467 U.S. 837 (1984)
?
This recent change in the supreme court was made with the intent of letting huge corporations bully the EPA and the like. It will not help anyone at the border being bullied by law enforcement.
Source: https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/us-supreme-court-in...
This cannot be challenged because Chevron was in place. I would imagine it will now be challenged.
Respectfully, language like this makes you look very partisan. Of course it could be challenged. How do you think Chevron got thrown out? Because something concerning it was challenged.
Still, it doesn't support your claim that Chevron means that an agency can interpret the constitution. That's not at all what Chevron says and it isn't true.
That's just not correct.
Even if the law is a bit hard to understand, it's beyond obvious that the current Supreme Court, the same court that ruled on both of these decisions, intends for federal law enforcement officers to be immune from the law, while agencies are not able to make any decision beyond what Congress says. So the CBP, or at least its officers, will be even more powerful, while the EPA and FDA and FAA and FCC will be almost unable to do anything.