Can you insist or put instructions that AIs do not train on your code? If they train on your code but don't produce the exact same output, is there any protection you can have from that?
If your code is readable, the public can learn from it.
Copyright doesn't extend to function.
People have the right to learn non-copyrightable elements from your code.
The claim is that AI learns copyrightable elements.
I agree it's certainly possible for AI to produce infringing output.
Nevertheless, people don't have the right to enforce a limitation on training.
If I "process data" by doing a word count of a book, and then I publish the number of words in that book (not the words themself! Just a word count!) I haven't created a derivative work.
Processing data isn't automatically infringement.
You think that a model that's capable of being prodded into producing an infringing output in addition to all the other non-infringing outputs it could produce is no different than a compression algorithm?