The solution to have human-in-the-loop appeals processes. And because companies don't want to pay for this, it should be enforced as regulation.
It's the invasion of privacy not accuracy rates of the model
One is that it has false positive and negatives, others, like you mentioned involve privacy. Some people even feel like it's an invasion of privacy and then justify their argument by saying that it has false positives and negatives.
Is it csam? I doubt it, those photos are for me and my wife who had to put up with it.
He finally wears underwear now.
Citation please. Once it is explained to them how it could work, what the failure cases are, what false positives cause (with real life examples, since it has already happened), etc, I doubt this would be even remotely true.