Not really. While consumers at home had 8MB, Intel was already looking to compete with PowerPC, DEC Alpha, MIPS systems where 4GB wasn't really out of the ordinary, so they knew where things were going.
Interestingly, while the Intel 450GX chipset was designed to daisy-chain DRAM controllers (1 controller chip per 4GB of RAM), none of the boards that actually could take >4GB used that, instead building their own solutions. Presumably that meant that there was a bug in the chipset.
Anyway, each of those 5 computers would have run you at least $500k in 1998.
(I've been on-and-off trying to acquire one of those boxes for a few years now.)
200 9.1GB SCSI disks for 1.8TB!
And still only 4GB RAM on that SQL Server 6.5 box they used for TPC-C. Wild.
And yeah, $770k for that server.
Edit: I guess whilst I'm at it...
Data General AV8600: https://www.tpc.org/results/individual_results/dg/dg.8600.es...
HP NetServer LXr Pro8: https://www.1000bit.it/ad/bro/hp/netserverlxrpor8.pdf
I think some Alpha systems had 8 GB installed even back then.
The Alpha was 64 bit native but Windows NT was still 32 bit so I think you needed VMS if you wanted more than 4 GB. A 64 bit version of Windows 2000 for Alpha was created but never released ( this was the first 64 bit Windows ).
It was not totally impossible to see beyond 4 GB of RAM.
There was no practical way to get anywhere near 4GB of RAM within the dollar cost that a person purchasing a $200 CPU on a $150 motherboard would be able to bear.