Could you name these metrics?

Because, nuclear loses according to all of these metrics, for a start:

1. the cost of energy produced.

2. operational flexibility (ability to follow demand).

3. operational cost (the average nuclear plant in the US employs 750).

4. project risk

Pretty much everything beats nuclear on 1, 3 and 4 while gas turbines, batteries and hydro beat nuclear on 2.

It doesn't even win on the fuel cost metric, given wind turbines and solar PV have zero costs in this regard.

If one doesn't count the ever-present possibility of freak accidents, the externalities, or the endless heaps of subsidies for nuclear (some covert in the way of colonial arrangements and other ways, others open), yes.

Except cost, construction time, and public acceptance.