There is no "healthy laziness." This is a cynical term that does a disservice to leaders who skillfully practice with a light touch.
Contrast this with someone just happily diligently working away no matter what, for the sake of keeping on moving. It's very easy to get stuck on a local maximum if you don't stop and think (i.e. do nothing) on a regular basis.
I think the author's point is that the latter can be quite harmful, which is evidently unintuitive for many people.
Granted, calling an effective servant leader "lazy" is possibly not great, and the word does have a negative connotation whether I like it or not.
That’s amazing. I can’t bring myself to. If the work is boring or pointless it just wont happen, or at a glacial pace.
Let's just say you're not interested in the thing you work on overall. Because you aren't or because you're disincentivized to think of the whole picture by the system you're in.