jqjq seems to be an academic or "because we can" project. fq from the same author has practical use https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36175000 It's shortly mentioned in the jqjq README, but maybe someone overlooked the 2 characters...
btw i didn't follow what you mean by "overlooked the 2 characters"?
Well, to be fair the probability that my input data or my jq code has bugs might even be higher...
Of course all software has bugs, but I guess most of us have never been bitten by a gcc or Python interpreter bug.
Yeah, the 2 characters deferred to the fq name. The jqjq README has a link, however without mentioning what it is about.
Yes report, and i'm one of the jq maintainers now a days :) and i think you can trust the result if your doing common things. The bugs i've encountered have usually been in exotic parts, ex https://github.com/jqlang/jq/issues/3128