> * All content that resides under the "explorer/ee/" directory of this repository is licensed under the license defined
in "explorer/ee/LICENSE".
Not really open source. If you care about that.
Not really open source. If you care about that.
But saying it's open source when its license does not follow OSI's definition is confusing at best, or misleading at worst.
OSI doesn't have a monopoly on the term, but that's the generally accepted definition (at least IME).