I either read articles that are 1) fun to read and silly, or 2) fun to read and informative. If they're not fun to read, it's unlikely that the content is any good. Good educators often know how to write in an engaging way. If the content is difficult to read, or super lengthy, it's probably shit content.
How do you judge quality of the information you're given when you have it summarized? How do you make sure the LLM didn't misunderstand something, like sarcasm, or a quote, etc.?