The real issue is the symbolism where people don't feel welcome I guess.
The real issue is the symbolism where people don't feel welcome I guess.
I think I misunderstood the article.
That's understandable, I think: This policy in the UK is so shockingly and bone-headedly stupid that it probably seems completely unbelievable, so your brain tries to interpret it in some other way that makes more sense.
Presumably the companies that really need to import talent would cover those fees for them if imported talent is actually necessary. Companies in the US pay similar fees to sponsor imported employees and no one complains about the costs.
That seems like an argument in favor of UK businesses paying these fees. It's an employee's market for top talent and employers bear the burden of paying any sorts of fees necessary to get top talent. The alternative is for that sort of industry to just not be viable in the UK.
my buddy was paying around $5k/month USD for his rent when he was doing FAANG work in SF.