Hacker News Reader

Comment by HPsquared | Hacker News Reader

I don't think it would break the neck. Typical AK47 bullet at 100yd has momentum 5 kgm/s, which is about the same as a baseball at 77mph.

View on HN

Guns are kinetic energy weapons, not momentum weapons. It’s the kinetic energy that matters.

Momentum is conserved, recoil momentum is the same as bullet momentum, yet recoil does not kill the shooter.

It's more the area of the bullet that matters. A small bullet or a thin needle require much less momentum/energy to penetrate a body than a big object.

If you place a bullet between rifle stock and the shoulder, then fire the rifle, it’s going to be mildly unpleasant, but the bullet won’t penetrate the skin, let alone kill the shooter.

Yes, but dissipating kinetic energy is a solvable problem unlike dissipating momentum.

The initial statement that's being refuted here is that a bulletproof helmet would break your neck and thus cannot work.

This statement is false because (besides such helmets existing on practice) your skull can absorb the momentum without too much damage and helmet can absorb the kinetic energy.

In the movies, the good guy casually fires a shot - one handed. He experiences almost no kickback.

But then the bullet hits the villain’s 300lb henchman, who is lifted off his feet and goes flying.

This is why people think bullets are magical momentum machines when in reality, due to air resistance, the momentum transfered to the target is even lower than at the moment of firing.

It indeed can't be too big because the shooter takes the same or greater momentum in the form of recoil. Conservation of momentum applies to the process of accelerating the bullet.

My favourite bit of AK47-helmet interface knowledge is that a French Jaguar pilot took an AK47 round to the helmet in the Gulf War. While flying.

(He survived, it's not really relevant here as it didn't stop the bullet - there was an exit hole too).

Reply on news.ycombinator.com