> They absolutely were, which is the tragedy of the whole thing, people absolutely loved their products and strongly preferred them to everything else on the market.
Concur. I had a Passport and it was a deal-changing sort of device.
The universal inbox was amazing technology, which totally reworked how a pocket comms device worked. Sadly as companies gradually dropped BB10 support, although you could run Android messaging clients, those didn't integrate with the BB10 inbox, so gradually the phone got less and less useful.
This should have been a reason to demand open comms protocols and legally require all comms-tools vendors to support 3rd party clients.
Today, I use Ferdium to connect almost all my comms apps into one client app, but it's just a bloated Electron thing that forcibly unifies dissimilar web apps. It's clever but it's not really a solution. It's a herd of elephants on a seesaw in order to crack a peanut.
Never mind laws about cookie banners, it should be a procurement requirement for all government agencies in the free world that all vendors must support a documented protocol so that native client apps can connect.
To Slack, Whatsapp, Signal, Telegram, Google $ChatAppOfTheMonth, MS Skype|Teams|Whatever.
No web apps, no Javascript, just mandatory lowest-common-denominator local rich clients, so that tools like BB10 could talk to everything.
Frankly I don't care if it doesn't support sound or video. I will go quite far to avoid that anyway. But text, basic formatting, smilies, maybe embedded static image files and attachments.
Nobody would lose from this.